Quote:
Originally Posted by FellaGaga-52
I thought he meant "frame of mind" which was important and legit. We have to ask ourselves, which side, religious or non-religious, is known most for clinging to their side of it at all costs, instead of being open to actual realities? The answer is obvious for all religions. No one has to say it. Of course to deny it it takes a lot of words, tons of sophistry all of which avoids the very basic realities of the world.
What if the holy ghost was first conceived of as exactly that: a ghost? Just another ghost by ghost believing peoples. I mean that's a problem. So when things like that are brought up, our religion compels us to make ad hominem attacks. And soar into sophistry that claims a pipeline to the almighty while ignoring any real world problems.
Anti-frames always have a justification. Always. To realize at some level that I have been hijacked by an anti-frame, and then to immediately make the move of considering justification - that simply means that I continue to be hijacked by the anti-frame.
There can be no appeal to considering justification if someone wants to cease being part of the problem and strive to be part of the solution.