That sounds fine, but you should realize that words like "logic" and phrases like "scientific method" already have fairly widely-used and well-understood meanings, and "logic" doesn't mean "scientific method". The distinction is meaningful and you'll probably have an easier time communicating if you use those terms in the standard ways. It will also make it harder for Aaron to side-track you from your actual goal
It might also be useful just to be more concrete. Instead of asking "how do you reconcile logic and religion", you might ask "how do you reconcile belief in the resurrection of Christ with scientific epistemology?" or something like that. The point being that if you reject belief in the resurrection it's probably not because you believe that it's
logically impossible (again, using the more standard definition), but that the idea is contrary to the evidence of human experience. Presumably, most of the objections you want to raise about Abrahamic religion with regard to "science" or "logic" are similar. For example, I think most questions about the authority or reliability of scripture would be similar.