Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckychess
Just because you don't know what the Godhead is doesn't preclude the possibility that some folks do know what the Godhead is.
I would assert that is nothing more irrational than denying the existence of God. If the universe is a mere accident (that is, was not made intentionally), then everything in the universe is an accident (i.e. unintentional). And unintentional rationality is an oxymoron.
Consider right now that you are trapped within the perspective of the religion. Just consider it. Notice that you just leapt from either "my god" or "irrational unintentional accident." That's a joke and almost cannot be taken as honest, that is, except for the profound influence of indoctrination. The idea that a quantum field is the "creator" and is in the role of "godhead" ... is a million times more rational than claims of genocidal, "chosen people," bigoted, superstitious, jealous, "you better have the right kind of sexual attraction," etc.
THE NEED FOR RATIONALITY IS HARDLY PROVIDED BY CLAIMS OF THIS OR THAT MAGIC GOD! That's absurd. Yet you leap straight from the need for rational to the superstition. I do believe that is ingenuous on your part ... not an overt deception but just a tremendous blind spot. There are many proposed rational origin explanations ... to the indoctrinated mind's surprise they are not limited to "A Magic Man did it." In fact, there are no explanations less rational than that.
I'm for a teleological, intentional, intelligent Nature that is the prime mover. That's way more rational and in evidence than proposing bukoos of gods. Personifying this force of nature into a "Being in the Sky" is a primitive formulation, a superstitious, limited comprehension explanation.