Quote:
Originally Posted by David Steele
I have read the book.
Krauss is not trying to argue philosophy, he right up front explains how he is going to define "nothing" and continues the rest of the book with explaining the latest cosmological science.
Now, can we all agree that natural science likely will be capable of explaining all phenomena, material and energy from some spaceless/energyless/matterless point?
D.
Oh, this is rich.
"I don't like the philosophical definition of nothing, so I'm going to go ahead and make my own definition, then look for supporting evidence to use for philosophical arguments."