Putting aside your argument that ignorance is a sign of holiness in the devout, you are not a man of God, you are God and therefore should know maths, along with everything else.

Since you don't know maths (or indeed simple logic), my initial hypothesis that you are not in fact Jesus, and merely a random bus nutcase, is confirmed.

If you see someone doesn't have any hands (tool), but can move around everything with his mind (still reaching his aims), ofc you will think: wow!
If you would see someone who only wishes that someone's cancer heals (reaching his aim) and it heals without any medication or other tools, than you will think: wow!

Again you did misquote me.

Trinity is just a way of subjective expression.

To make all of this simple to understand:
You cannot be loyal as long as you don't absolutely obey. As long as you are not absolutely loyal, god will not reveal to you the secret of omnipotence.
Why he wouldn't? Because you would make the whole world a big bordel and if something would make you tilt, than you would destroy the whole world and yourself and everything else.
As I am absolutely loyal to God, for everyone it is good to be loyal to me cause only in this case the secret of omnipotence will be revealed to them.

Yes, this would/could be debated heavily. Even I know there are several references in both the OT and NT to "us", "the holy spirit" and other quotes that could be taken to mean there is more than one. But if this is really bothersome, I could change my question to: How are you god when your father is god?

A good AMA must be at least one of funny, informative, or thought provoking. Since you have done none of these, I submit that either you are not Jesus, or Jesus is a colossal bore.

I don't think you know what misquoting means.

But then again, as you have already established: This is just another surefire sign of your divinity.

Finally a nice question!
This dilemma exists because philosophers are not lovers. In love there is no good and no bad. Good and bad only exist when someone is driven by his ego.

Good means: something is beneficial. Nothing is beneficial to God.
Bad means: something hurts. Nothing can hurt God.
For someone who falls in love the same is valid.

An example: If you are in love with a woman and she tells you go and set yourself on fire, you will not think in terms of 'beneficial' and 'harmful', you will just do it. If you don't and think in terms of 'beneficial' and 'harmful', you have not ever been in love in the first place. You just tried to make her subordinate to yourself. This means you have been her enemy.

Being an enemy of God, doesn't benefit god and doesn't harm god, but it will harm you, because you don't have enough power to fight god.

This means, not being in love with God is bad for you. Being in love with God means: Everything what God commands is good. It is not good for God, God doesn't benefit from it. But it is good for you, because if you do what god commands, it means you are as powerful as god, you are god. Why? Because there is no difference between God and his commands.

Just think about the example above, what makes the woman who we love, is not her body. It is her 'will' (command). When we really love her, we are in love in her 'will', when we are not truly in love with her, than we love her body. When we are in love in her body, sooner or later we will be her enemy.
Her body will change with time, her 'will' not.

To make the effects more clear: When someone is in love in her body and she whores around (this would be his point of view: She doesn't do what I want [not subordinated to me], so she is a whore), he will either harm her or her lovers or both of them or harm his self. But if he would be in love in her will (commands), all of this wouldn't disturb him, he wouldn't harm anyone, he would love everything what she loves. He would be loyal in every direction.

Look at Peter, he did deny me 3 times, he was still my enemy.
But look at Spartacus, when his enemy tried to catch him, everyone of his followers said: 'I am Spartacus'.

Long live Spartacus. I couldn't educate some handful followers, Spartacus did educate 1000s!

How old were you when you spoke your first word (also, was it 'momma' or 'dadda'?)

If a stranger is charging at me in an attempt to attack , what shall I do?

What did make him attack you?
What does he intend with his attack?
What are your options?

I have no idea as the man is a total stranger to me.


The attacker intends to inflict pain to the point of death with his hands, head, feet as no usable objects which would be deemed weapons are laying around.


In terms of weapons, The same as the attacker. So what do I do?

Is the attacker older or younger than you?

My father doesn't like competitions which determine a winner and a loser.

Ah I see, previously I wasn't sure if the thread was meant to be a joke or not.

Sorry but tricks don't work with me. You expect me to answer, than your question should be precise and to the point and not something which enables you to come up with 'but...' no matter what I would response.

This is true. There is nothing in the biblical narrative which indicates that there will ultimately be rewards and punishments.

It seems you don't read any sentence completely or you just forget about the parts which you don't like or don't confirm your beliefs.

It is not a competition. A competition is with the aim to embarrass the loser.
Jesus shows the way out of embarrassment.

You really need to stop talking about yourself in the 3rd person.

It is impressive how you accuse someone of "forgetting parts they don't like" (paraphrased), and then proceed right into a blanket statement of epic proportions.

Then again; Moderation just looks so undignified, am I right?

I'm still waiting to hear whether your first words were to mommy/Mary, or to daddy (and which daddy, obv).

What is the purpose of my life?

or to expand on that, why did you create human beings?

Then why was the apostle Paul an athlete who often used sports metaphors in his sermons?

Imagine my previous question with the addition of knowing the stranger(I have no clue who the stranger is) charging me is the same age as myself. The stranger appears to be the same body build, and again, the stranger is charging at me about to attack me by using his fists and feet as weapons, there are no knifes or guns laying around or any item that could be deemed an effective weapon. As for the location, we are on sand, a few miles into a desert.


What do I do?

Go ahead and argue why my thesis 'Jesus teaches the way out of embarrassment' is wrong.
Do it better than I did it.

Don't remember, Don't know.