You are sitting in a bus with other guys from RGT, driving to Las Vegas playing some poker. Unfortunately your bus is hitted by a thunderbolt and you find yourself back in time, sitting at the same table with Jesus.
What would you ask him?
As smug as I am , I will play the part of Jesus and answer your questions.

1) Everyone has only one question, Christians are also welcome!

2) No historical questions, the questions should be in regard of understanding his point of view.

Can you provide a short proof of the Goldbach Conjecture?

Boxers or briefs?

A few genuine questions,

Would you create a thread in which you assume the identity of Muhammad? Or even Husayn ibn Ali for that matter?

Why are you such a dick?*

*wanted to get this one over with quickly

I would, but the opening post would be "Where dem nine year olds at?" and it would probably get closed soon after.

The reason is: What makes me such a dick is the way you see me, otherwise how could someone be 'such a dick' when he only teaches the art of love?

My friend Lazarus was sick, I did go back to Judea to help him although they had tried to stone me the last time I have been there.
I give my life for my friends, do you do it too?

1) There is no difference between them.

2) They are from a cultural point of view too far away from those participating in this thread.

3) What we know about Jesus is more compact.

4) The ppl in this forum are still way less biased towards Jesus than any Muslim.

No difference as long as they are not eye-catching. Should be as simple and as cheap as possible. Must be agreeable to god not to women.

One of my followers wanted to marry a second woman, he said in the future there will be a prophet who marries lots of women and young girls. I told him: Why do you use a prophet as an example, I tell you there will be a king named Naser al-Din Shah Qajar. He will marry over 80 women and young girls. First become a king than marry more than 80 women and young girls too.

I am not a mathematician, in terms of science I am kinda illiterate .
I have a heavenly degree in loyalty.

As part of the Holy Trinity, you are either omnipotent or have access to such a source, seems pretty fail that maths is beyond your abilities.

Your objection assumes that not knowing mathematic is a leak. But it is not.
Look, human try to know mathematics for that they can manipulate the nature and (or) for that they can make business.
1)But if I can turn water into wine (manipulating the nature) without mathematic than mathematic loses its meaningfulness. Not knowing something what is meaningless is not a leak.
2) If I would try to make business and I wouldn't know mathematic, than this would be a leak also, but as I don't need to make any business, as god did give me everything what I desire, than not knowing mathematic is not a leak.
3) In the world of God there is no 0 and 1 and 2. There is no up and no down, no back and no forth.
Not knowing them as a human is a leak, not knowing them as a man of God is a privilege, is a sign of being omnipotent.

Not knowing is a sign of omnipotence?

That's good to know.

Mathematic is not real knowledge and not real science. Mathematic is a tool. Not knowing mathamatic means one doesn't need a tool, who has real knowledge, he doesn't need a tool. Not to need a tool is a sign of omnipotence. Needing a tool means, whenever the tool is not available than you are vulnerable. Being invulnerable is a sign of omnipotence.
And as explained in the last post: Not knowing is not a sign of omnipotence. I said: not knowing something what is meaningless is not a leak, it is a sign of omnipotence when you can rich your aims without needing mathematic.

Please try to quote me correctly.

what is the correct resolution to the Euthyphro dilemma

Ok, so not knowing a tool is a sign of omnipotence.

That is useful to know.

Hi Jesus.

Explain this trinity thing to me and how you're all related. And if I can get a follow up...

Exactly why is it a good thing for people to eat your body and drink your blood?

Thanks.

The Trinity did not appear until the mid 4th century. AFAIK the word Trinity is not in the OT, nor does the OT refer to God as multiple persons in the manner of the Trinity. Of course folks will debate this point heavily.

I can't speak for Jesus, and I'm leaving the trinity one alone at least for now, because I'm not sure how to begin answering it, but to eat the body and drink the blood of Christ is a symbol for the necessity of a real union with the Divine. Not a knowledge about God, but communion, a participation and sharing with that is ontological and not just epistemological.

I don't know if you are being tongue in cheek here or not, but just in case fake jesus's opinion is anything close to shahrad's opinion, I would strongly agree to this comment.

This thread is insanely dumb. What was the point of starting this OP.

That carpentry can be done without math?

And without tools. I'm not sure what happens if you try to make a tool though.