Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Pidasso
Suppose kidneys could be donated with no negative impact whatsoever to the life of the donor, then I would say you a moral obligation to donate.
Why would I suppose that?
Quote:
However this is not the state of affairs. To force a person to donate a kidney is an act of valuing the recipient human being more than the human being that is the donor.
I'm really confused. Earlier you posted that a measure of valuing life equally is maximizing the number of human beings who survive a situation. Now you seem to be saying that we cannot expect you to act to maximize the number of human beings who survive a situation. Careful, I see genocide in your future...
You tell us we need to change our evil ways, and value every human life equally. Then you tell us that you cannot be expected to bear any negative impact whatsoever to help a dying person, else we be accused of valuing that dying person more than you. And you call us evil?
And I am curious how you can suggest that you cannot be expected to bear any negative impact whatsoever to save a human life, but you do expect a woman to do so to save a fetus.
Last edited by Oshenz11; 05-17-2011 at 01:31 AM.
Reason: fixed typo