Quote:
Originally Posted by Do0rDoNot
Correct it's not an argument. To make an argument you need to use logic.
The problem is that you've continually used ill-defined concepts. What do you mean when you say that a property is "immutable"?
For example, according to how you've defined things, neeel is an immutable part of the universe, because if he didn't exist, then the universe (as we currently know it) wouldn't exist. Is that the same concept of immutability that you mean here, or is that a different thing?
Furthermore, if neeel is being illogical, then illogic is a property of part of the universe, and is hence a property of the universe itself, so that the universe is illogical. This would also contradict the immutability claim (at least, as I understand the term immutable).
So mostly, I think you're spouting off nonsense but it's nonsense because you're not taking the time to actually think carefully about what you're saying. You're in state where you think that simply asserting and reasserting your claims is going to make progress for you, which is never really a good sign.