Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Pretty much only an imbecile could read what I actually wrote and think that that is my argument.
Have a nice day!
The fool has said in his heart that there is no God. - Psalm 14:1
Here are *YOUR* premises (I'm QUOTING you):
***********
1) Premise: Jesus was (and is) who He claimed to be (Lord), or He was a liar or a lunatic.
2) Premise: Liars and lunatics don't produce enduring legacies of love that produces sweet fruit from those who follow them.
3)Premise: Jesus produced an enduring legacy of love that produces sweet fruit from those who follow Him.
******
1) I agree with #1.... but I think he was a liar/lunatic.
2) I disagree with #2. Liars & lunatics can have fanatical followings who profess happiness/love. Furthermore, terms like "enduring" and "sweet fruit" are vague & subjective.
3) Christianity made a lot of people happy... this says NOTHING about its truth. It also has been responsible for much suffering in the world (which similarly says NOTHING about its truth).
I'm not an imbecile. Calling people names (either directly or by implication) does not advance your argument.