Dear everyone here, thanks for your presence.
Now I will continue or resume expounding on the default status of things in the totality of being which is existence.
How do we, Oh dear silent majority, know that there is existence?
Simple, from our experience of things in existence, like as I say again and again, the experience of the nose in our face, the balls with us guys hanging from our lower torso, the nipples on our upper torso, and the fart exiting from our a-hole: all are examples of the common and communal experience of mankind, and also of course things which are part and parcel of the environment we live in, which all, we and our body parts and processes and all the part and parcel of our environment, they all make up the universe studied by scientists.
There, experience is the proof of the existence of things and the justification of the truth, the fact, the logic, and the history of ideas, that existence is the default status of things in the totality of being.
What about humans who deny that experience is the ground for our certainty that we exist?
Don't talk with them, period.
Next, experience tells us that everything in the universe we experience has a beginning. and wherefore simple logic tells us that things with a beginning have a cause, which cause can be and usually is a link of causes ending of course ultimately in a final first cause.
That kind of thinking is what we call and know and practice with using our reason and intelligence, we call as the method of thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas to arrive at certainty of our knowledge of things existing independent of our mind.
So, from the experience of things existing with a beginning we infer to the existence of things with no beginning, meaning they simply, just, purely exist, period.
This means that from logic which is correct thinking, things in existence in the ultimate terms are of two classes, namely: things existing from others, and things existing from themselves.
And further on with logic, things existing from others because they have a beginning, they owe their beginning to things existing without a beginning, meaning these latter things simply, just, purely exist, period.
Do you notice, dear silent majority, that from experience we come to the certainty of existence, and from the experience of our having a beginning as also everything we experience have also a beginning, we infer to the existence of things without a beginning, meaning they simply, just, purely exist, period.
Further on with logic, we infer to the truth, and fact, and logic, and thus a crucial piece of the history of ideas with mankind, that things with a beginning owe their existence to things without beginning for these latters simply, just, purely exist.
The things with a beginning from logic we call things existing from others, and the things existing simply, just, purely, without beginning, we call them things existing from themselves.
What about God in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
He is the Number One among the things existing from themselves simply, just, purely, without beginning; and I call Him with the name in English, God.
Now, dear silent majority, do you see something questionable with my exposition?
I will now put numbers to each paragraph above, so that you can refer to them by their numbers, to tell me which one you find questionable.
Please, only one per post.
1. How do we, Oh dear silent majority, know that there is existence?
2. Simple, from our experience of things in existence, like as I say again and again, the experience of the nose in our face, the balls with us guys hanging from our lower torso, the nipples on our upper torso, and the fart exiting from our a-hole: all are examples of the common and communal experience of mankind, and also of course things which are part and parcel of the environment we live in, which all, we and our body parts and processes and all the part and parcel of our environment, they all make up the universe studied by scientists.
3. There, experience is the proof of the existence of things and the justification of the truth, the fact, the logic, and the history of ideas, that existence is the default status of things in the totality of being.
4. What about humans who deny that experience is the ground for our certainty that we exist?
5. Don't talk with them, period.
6. Next, experience tells us that everything in the universe we experience has a beginning. and wherefore simple logic tells us that things with a beginning have a cause, which cause can be and usually is a link of causes ending of course ultimately in a final first cause.
7. That kind of thinking is what we call and know and practice with using our reason and intelligence, we call as the method of thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas to arrive at certainty of our knowledge of things existing independent of our mind.
8. So, from the experience of things existing with a beginning we infer to the existence of things with no beginning, meaning they simply, just, purely exist, period.
9. This means that from logic which is correct thinking, things in existence in the ultimate terms are of two classes, namely: things existing from others, and things existing from themselves.
10. And further on with logic, things existing from others because they have a beginning, they owe their beginning to things existing without a beginning, meaning these latter things simply, just, purely exist, period.
11. Do you notice, dear silent majority, that from experience we come to the certainty of existence, and from the experience of our having a beginning as also everything we experience have also a beginning, we infer to the existence of things without a beginning, meaning they simply, just, purely exist, period.
12. Further on with logic, we infer to the truth, and fact, and logic, and thus a crucial piece of the history of ideas with mankind, that things with a beginning owe their existence to things without beginning for these latters simply, just, purely exist.
13. The things with a beginning from logic we call things existing from others, and the things existing simply, just, purely, without beginning, we call them things existing from themselves.
14. What about God in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
15. He is the Number One among the things existing from themselves simply, just, purely, without beginning; and I call Him with the name in English, God.
Now, dear silent majority, do you see something questionable with my exposition?
Please, choose only one per post.
Happy thinking and writing!
