fwiw, the above proof also fails on this:
Quote:
Premise 3:Thoughts have existence, therefore they exist in the universe and their existence is also as energy; and also therefore every thought that has ever existed has always existed in one form or another. Premise 4: the thought that an omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, unchangeable, universal being known as God exists, therefore this thought has always existed in one form or another of energy, even when humans have not existed.
1st bolded is only not wrong if "in one form or another" means "at least as energy". As energy, the content of the thought, arguably, is lost. Same goes for the thought about an omni... etc. and thus, in its energy-form it doensn't require a thinker.
If you wanted more than this, i.e. full-fledged thoughts swirling through the universe, you'd have a host of other ontological issues quite aside from the question of the existence of god.