Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Formula? Formula?

03-14-2014 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
We haven't gone that far. We haven't put things in a category or decided them at all, just set up the division.

But I think not.

Unless we merge them...
So pretty much, nothing means anything yet.
Formula? Quote
03-14-2014 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron W.
So pretty much, nothing means anything yet.
ya. its as far as I got, but i think so far we're good.
Formula? Quote
03-14-2014 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
ya. its as far as I got, but i think so far we're good.
I disagree.
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 01:10 PM
Even if I accept this formula I don't know what's left behind when we remove superstition and science from everything, so I'm no closer to understanding what God is equal to.

Not that I particularly want to accept that "everything - science" means anything.
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Even if I accept this formula I don't know what's left behind when we remove superstition and science from everything, so I'm no closer to understanding what God is equal to.
we might be slightly closer if we have a workable formula. But you understand, its just all we have said is, what is left over is 'god'.

haven't define the word god or the religion whatsoever, just a variable in place of whats minus superstition and science from totality (e).
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
we might be slightly closer if we have a workable formula. But you understand, its just all we have said is, what is left over is 'god'.

haven't define the word god or the religion whatsoever, just a variable in place of whats minus superstition and science from totality (e).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
haven't define the word god or the religion whatsoever, just a variable in place of whats minus superstition and science from totality (e).
but you called that "variable" god. You can be doing one of two things. Either you can be defining God by saying that God is everything except superstition and science (or technically define one of the other words, but this is unlikely) OR we can have a previous understanding of what the word God is and you are hypothesizing that this previously understood concept of God is in fact equal to everything except superstition and science. Which is it?

Also notice how I didn't need a single "formula" for that paragraph.
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
but you called that "variable" god. You can be doing one of two things. Either you can be defining God by saying that God is everything except superstition and science (or technically define one of the other words, but this is unlikely) OR we can have a previous understanding of what the word God is and you are hypothesizing that this previously understood concept of God is in fact equal to everything except superstition and science. Which is it?

Also notice how I didn't need a single "formula" for that paragraph.
i think its the former but its not very defined, only in relation to the others which are really only defined in relation to each other.

(also they are not defined by wikipedia, not sure how that got confused)

Last edited by newguy1234; 03-15-2014 at 03:32 PM.
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 03:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
i think its the former but its not very defined, only in relation to the others which are really only defined in relation to each other.
A squiggle is twice a grumph. A grumph is half a squiggle. I have no idea what a squiggle or a grumph is, but there is a relation between them. How am I do know whether this relationship is actually true? Well I would have to have an independent understanding of what a squiggle and a grumph is. DUCY?
Formula? Quote
03-15-2014 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
DUCY?
yes i do!
Formula? Quote

      
m