Quote:
Originally Posted by zumby
Unpossible. Everyone knows game theorists only work on waging war.
The paper is over my head obv, but I didn't get the impression they were looking for peace. Seems clear though that high level game thoery is a precursor to AI. Maybe we know that already.
I don't find this all funny though. Take a look at Syria with the largest supply of Chemical weapons in middle east. If they deploy those will you just not care? I think not caring is why these things happen. I don't think its because of 'evil', I think its soley ignorance.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
and solving LHE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Original Position
Same thing.
Not sure if this is what you meant, but ya solving LHE, the paper you posted (maybe), and war are all the same thing.
When you take game theory and use it together, to mutually achieve a desired result, thats a step towards peace. Not sure why people can't see that here.
The question still stands though, no one has answered, would you change your direction in poker if it was shown that solving the game together would bring about peace?
I did find something I didn't understand about NE, I know the no one can gain by deviating, but I thought if someone deviates they lose, but perhaps thats only in certain aspects of poker? Maybe its not a rule at all.