Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizard-50
I think your logic is derailed from the get-go here. Why does someone or something fully-functional not able to find use in other people or things? I'm fully functional without a hat on, but that does not mean a hat is of no use to me.
Mankind has dominion over all other animals. There are many distinctions made between man the the rest of creation.
Okay, God doesn't need me. He is totally independent of me. Why do I need to worship him? Why do I need to please him?Why is he controlling me? Why is he expecting things from me? Since he is a totally independent and self sufficient entity, he should treat me as his other creations.
Why do I have dominion over other species? Does he need a watchman to look over this planet?
Theology has never been able to explain things or worldly phenomenon without making huge assumptions at every other step. Even after making those huge assumptions, we are not able to explain God's wishes and the physical and natural phenomenons.
Don't you think its only logical to believe what we see instead of trusting some book which has no authenticity. How can the people who wrote it be more advanced than us? How can they ever do justice to something as complicated as theology? How can it trusted to be God's word?
Isn't it more possible that everything was mythical? isn't it more possible that things were blown out of proportion when the story of Jesus passed from one ignorant villager to another? Don't you think that it could be a myth which grew and grew due to aggressive work of Missionaries all over the world?
I would say all of the above looks more probable than the limited logical reasoning that theists offer for existence of God.