Quote:
a set of teachings that have inspired and improve the lives and overall well-being of a significant amount of people of varying backgrounds.
im always amazed at the 'utility=truth' argument. its truly mindboggling.
even if they had a set of teachings that inspired and improved peoples lives, that would say absolutely nothing about the truth claims made by that church.
i could start my own religion right this second. my tenets would be that every person should strive their very best to do well in school, and be kind to others...else they face grave punishments from a new god I just made up. if people switched over to my religion, and really tried hard to live by its teachings, damn near everyones lives would be improved. does my newly created god then exist? would you then have to acknowledge my religion as "a legetimate faith?"
isn't a religion being created by a science fiction writer enough to bar any future possibilities of legitimization? how much more obvious can fraud be?