Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMario7
So the assertion that you believe without evidence. Ok fine!
Good. You've accomplished grade 1 reading comprehension.
Quote:
So I ask you a question now: Do you only believe your beliefs are correct if you have evidence?
You're adding another question to the mix. Are you sure you want to do that?
Quote:
Also go ahead and show your evidence.
No. That's not the next step. The next step is that you must have a more robust understanding of why people come to believe what they believe. Your concept of evidence, as demonstrated by your Santa Claus example is severely lacking. Indeed, you made an argument that's about as anti-evidence as possible because the *ONE* piece of evidence (presents under the tree) argues in FAVOR of Santa Claus and not against it. Yet you concluded wrongly.
Quote:
For the record not playing your stupid game kid!
Are you certain this is true? I think there's sufficient evidence to the contrary. You just haven't realized it yet. So your rejection of reality stems not from a lack of evidence, but from a lack of understanding.
Quote:
Your next step is now to present your argument, how YOU form beliefs, then why/how your beliefs are suddenly facts and not just beliefs and lastly show your evidence that God is real and Jesus is the Son of God.
No, the next step is for you to learn and to understand. I've said this from the beginning. If you can't even properly conceive of how someone would come to believe something simple, such as the non-existence of Santa Claus as a fat home invader, then you have no chance conceiving of how someone might come to look at complex phenomena.
I just barely got you to do elementary reading comprehension. You're not ready yet. Let's work on getting you to learn about Santa Claus and why your presentation is terrible.