Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Boycott threat on Starbucks founder

08-21-2011 , 04:57 PM
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-21-2011 , 05:57 PM
Looks like Splendour is finally fighting back for her RGT crown, which has been severly contested by Doggg in the last few weeks.
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 10:25 AM
Why do people still expect an iota of rationality from Splendour? This is only going to become a pointless hijack (if it hasn't already).
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by la6ki
Will you comment on the fact that homosexuality isn't harmful and that's why it's not a disability?

I'm not sure that is even relevant. It's really just a question that prioritizes human perspectives ahead of God's.

Who is arguing that everything is all right with the human race? And WTF does this have to do with anything?

Imo it makes it rather obvious man has a weak and sinful nature.
...
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schef
Looks like Splendour is finally fighting back for her RGT crown, which has been severly contested by Doggg in the last few weeks.
Don't call it a comeback---she never left!
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splendour
I'm not sure that is even relevant. It's really just a question that prioritizes human perspectives ahead of God's.
So the World Health Organization should not use science, but the Bible to decide what's a mental disorder?
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by la6ki
So the World Health Organization should not use science, but the Bible to decide what's a mental disorder?
I wasn't arguing from a WHO position. I was merely using the definition for thinking purposes.

The difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals when they're not in the closet is obvious and it does have a physiological cause in my opinion. Whether or not they hurt anyone is irrelevant (though you could argue they hurt themselves mightily with AIDS and other anatomy arguments).

I think and a lot of Christians would agree that they hurt themselves in the worst way though by a failure to develop a relationship with God. We don't have to go into all the medical aspects. The primary damage done to a homosexual is that he has a harder time developing a relationship with God because the world works on making him resentful towards God and toward the bible which is one of the easiest places to learn and gain access to God.

I think the world exaggerates the sex need. People's relationship needs are greater and what is greater than the need for a relationship with God. Isn't the biggest problem for homosexuals relationships not sex.

Why doesn't everyone get out of their business and let them decide for themselves. Because of the scandal factor. People are sinful and they always like to get their noses in anything scandalous and nothing is as scandalous as sex.
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splendour
I wasn't arguing from a WHO position. I was merely using the definition for thinking purposes.
You were providing definitions from the WHO organization earlier, so this right here is a lie.

Quote:
The difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals when they're not in the closet is obvious and it does have a physiological cause in my opinion. Whether or not they hurt anyone is irrelevant (though you could argue they hurt themselves mightily with AIDS and other anatomy arguments).
Unprotected anal sex causes cancer, not homosexuality.

Quote:
I think and a lot of Christians would agree that they hurt themselves in the worst way though by a failure to develop a relationship with God. We don't have to go into all the medical aspects. The primary damage done to a homosexual is that he has a harder time developing a relationship with God because the world works on making him resentful towards God and toward the bible which is one of the easiest places to learn and gain access to God.
What about those homosexuals that don't give a damn about developing a relationship with "God"? Do they also have a psychological disorder?

Quote:
Why doesn't everyone get out of their business and let them decide for themselves. Because of the scandal factor. People are sinful and they always like to get their noses in anything scandalous and nothing is as scandalous as sex.
Completely agree. You and Aaron should get out of people's bedroom and let them do whatever they want there.
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 12:15 PM
Homophobia is just another example of the insecurity of christians and their quest for power.
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote
08-22-2011 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by la6ki
You were providing definitions from the WHO organization earlier, so this right here is a lie.

Sonny, everybody knows Ole Splendour wikis constantly. That's a wiki quote. WHO is merely incidental.

Unprotected anal sex causes cancer, not homosexuality.



What about those homosexuals that don't give a damn about developing a relationship with "God"? Do they also have a psychological disorder?

If you ask me everybody has a psychological disorder. Partly from spiritual blindness and partly from bodily weakness. Their's just takes another a particular form and weakness. Why do we focus on them so much instead of our own blindness and problems?

Completely agree. You and Aaron should get out of people's bedroom and let them do whatever they want there.

Oh I would if the damn atheists would stop using them as an argument to pretend to be "holier than" theists. Always trying to build coalitions against God based on human weakness....
You can't build a foundation on weakness. Though you may deceive yourself into thinking you can.

It always baffles me so many atheist poker players that regularly swim in deception on the poker table can't spot the world's deceptions to save their lives.
Boycott threat on Starbucks founder Quote

      
m