Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder
So the damages these plaintiffs are claiming, consist of "emotional distress". After they got paid and accepted it to do whatever they did. This looks to me like they are just looking for some more gravy. These suits should be totally thrown out, and Long can face the consequences from his own organization (which should include the board firing him if true), but not from the legal system.
This.
I'm not taking up for the guy in any way... I just question the validity of their claims. Sure...if he engaged in homosexual acts... he's a hypocrite. Is he any more of a hypocrite than the person who claims to be an animal rights activist but wears leather shoes?
Even if these accusations are true, which I doubt, these were adult men who made a choice to accept money for sex...which makes them whores.
Is the testimony of a whore valid?
A whore who is in jail for stealing from a church makes a claim that they were paid for sex. Really? Let the church deal with the guy but this doesn't need to clog up the court system.