Quote:
Originally Posted by Sommerset
I would've had to read it if you hadn't crow barred it into a thread where it didn't belong to push an agenda against Ehrman, luckily that's no longer an issue.
On topic: A common criticism I have seen against Ehrman is that he diverges a bit in his popular work from the opinions expressed in his scholarly work. From what I have seen (which is, admittedly, not much) this seems at least to be a charge worth taking seriously.
pro tip: resorting to correcting grammatical and/or spelling mistakes is the last gasp of the person with no argument left.
Yawn.
I presented an opposing view-point to Ehrman's and apparently that
got your panties all in a wad.
Your lame rhetoric is laughable. I correct your spelling, and you assume
it's because I have no argument left? ROFL. Is that all you got?
The funnier thing is, you accuse me of turning threads into a
pissing contest, and you're the one doing the pissing.