.

As said before, the contract is probably only unfair if the horse could not be bothered to apply to more than on backer, in which case its his fault. I find it hard to believe that if he is a hard working, trustworthy player, that every backer would offer him this sort of deal.

Honestly competition between backers at the moment is pretty high with free coaching being thrown in by everyone, which as we know is expensive. I expect alot of backers make a similar amount staking as they would coaching, except they have there own money at risk. When you add into the fact we have to deal with some extremely scummy people and get money stolen from us on a frequent basis, staking is not the money printing cakewalk that many in this thread make it out to be.

unrealzeal ****ing up another thread... standard.

Pretty well sums up your problem imo, ...you actually believe horses and their stakers are on opposing sides.

1mtm91 has repaid us the equity from double booking and no longer owes us any money.

PM me if you have any questions.

Ty for clearing this up, hope my name is no longer dented.