yeah I guess this thread is as good as it gets, as another posters thread with similar questions was moved into this..
what would be a fair deal for this?
I will be staked for NL200FR (playing NL100 for a living on my own the whole year)
I will get significant rakeback and I will participate (and hopefully finish high) in a rake race too
staking duration is for the race, so betweeen 20 and 30 days (havnt decided which race exactly yet)
as neither me nor my backer have ever done something like this we dont know any "standard" deals
but none of us want to take advantage of the other so I thought I asked you guys..
I had an offer from another backer before that was like this:
"I would say something like you can keep 75% table winnings, but i would want 25% of the rakeback and 40% race money."
is this standard/fair?
seemed a bit low on the backer's end tbh when I got the offer first,
compared to the STT/MTT deals I saw, but of course if its standard for CG I'd try to settle for something similar..
also we need some kind of a makeup deal, right?
there should be no way that one party makes money while the other one loses/breaks even..
we also had the idea of him giving me some $$ and I would also add some $$ out of my own BR,
selling him some % of my play instead getting staked 100%,
how should this change the figures.. if we go from 100% to say 50/50 ?
thank you in advance for any help, much appreciated