God dammit, I was originally going to make a joke about how all we really need to do is castrate the idiots, but I didn't know how obvious that joke would be. So I went with something different. I see my folly now.
Okay, one... how would you implement intelligence tests or measures to gauge that people understand what is going on, even? In an already corrupt government that seems just totally impossible.
Government implements things all the time, these are unrelated.
Two... You can't deny people the right to vote. Simply doing that would make this not a democracy.
Its not a democracy now, so I have no problem with that.
Third... for some people certain issues are worth more than others, and they know about some more than others as well.
That's fine, but if they are too lazy to at least look into the other issues than **** them.
fourth.... this is a really dumb argument
no u
fifth... they already tried making black people take literacy tests and that was just an epic failure and a means to control the vote.
they administered a test they knew blacks would fail because they weren't educated, everyone has the ability to educate themselves now so if they are too lazy to do so they don't get the right to vote, ez game its their choice.
sixth... if you want to fix the ****ing problem you need to start learning children real history. We need to fix our schools, etc and so forth and then maybe the issues would matter to more people.
This is not the problem, although it is a problem in society in general.
Seventh... none of it really matters anyways. The government is run by the people with money. The lobbyists control everything, simply changing the criteria to vote won't change a thing. Our candidates suck choosing the least of two evils is growing old.
This is a different subject and really not relevant to the discussion
How can you ask questions based in fact when the answers are always going to be subjective. You're asking people what they believe about the issues, it's subjective in nature.
Also... people are so easily corruptible anyways, that it would be just another method of stealing elections. Develop a question that would leave out the democrats and you're done. I
no you don't ask there opinion you ask them questions that would show they have some knowledge about what they are voting on. Not every question is subjective.
I don't even know if I want to dignify your response with a response.
Also, I am busy putting on makeup to go to orientation.
I'd like to see you try, because it really isn't.
Last edited by kylmac85; 04-08-2009 at 03:24 PM.
Reason: also in the future try not to be such a bitch when you are posting, it doesn't help your arguments
God dammit, I was originally going to make a joke about how all we really need to do is castrate the idiots, but I didn't know how obvious that joke would be. So I went with something different. I see my folly now.
just to explain why it isn't relevant a little bit
Seventh... none of it really matters anyways. The government is run by the people with money. The lobbyists control everything, simply changing the criteria to vote won't change a thing. Our candidates suck choosing the least of two evils is growing old.
By changing the criteria so you would need to be informed to vote the candidates would be forced to change. So this is not a good argument because it is just plain wrong.