omg omg omg 156
02-11-2016
, 08:33 AM
02-11-2016
, 08:34 AM
02-11-2016
, 08:46 AM
Now, your little list is adorable...and it states things that everyone itt already knows.
But if that floats your boat. You go gurrrl!
So that we're clear. You agree with me that Australian people write and enforce truly heinous policy that has no foundation in logic, morality, or the country's own best interests.
Australian Women are soulless harpies who make hideous false claims about abuse "90%" of the time. They have no sense of right or wrong, only $$.
...I wonder where their fathers went wrong in raising them?
Last edited by Kristy; 02-11-2016 at 08:47 AM.
Reason: Added a smiley, bitches love smileys
02-11-2016
, 08:49 AM
02-11-2016
, 08:54 AM
Quote:
I will keep going. Thanks for the encouragement.
Now, your little list is adorable...and more idiocy
it states things that everyone itt already knows. First smart thing you have said and to be honest it's not really that smart
But if that floats your boat. You go gurrrl! more idiocy
So that we're clear. You agree with me that Australian people write and enforce truly heinous policy that has no foundation in logic, morality, or the country's own best interests. The policies were written for the peoples especially female best interests (as as a country we do give a **** about that although you would obv choose to think this is BS as it's coming from a male) it is however being abused by lawyers and yes shockingly females. But being a female lets not try and explain that to you
Australian Women are soulless harpies who make hideous false claims about abuse "90%" of the time. They have no sense of right or wrong, only $$. more idiocy and is not my comments - 90% of all family court cases involve it (IVO proceedings that are a completely seperate civil matter) being attached does not suggest 100% are unwarranted. I would suggest it is a fairly large figure though >50%
...I wonder where their fathers went wrong in raising them? Not sure same could be said about you at the moment
Now, your little list is adorable...and more idiocy
it states things that everyone itt already knows. First smart thing you have said and to be honest it's not really that smart
But if that floats your boat. You go gurrrl!
more idiocySo that we're clear. You agree with me that Australian people write and enforce truly heinous policy that has no foundation in logic, morality, or the country's own best interests. The policies were written for the peoples especially female best interests (as as a country we do give a **** about that although you would obv choose to think this is BS as it's coming from a male) it is however being abused by lawyers and yes shockingly females. But being a female lets not try and explain that to you
Australian Women are soulless harpies who make hideous false claims about abuse "90%" of the time. They have no sense of right or wrong, only $$. more idiocy and is not my comments - 90% of all family court cases involve it (IVO proceedings that are a completely seperate civil matter) being attached does not suggest 100% are unwarranted. I would suggest it is a fairly large figure though >50%
...I wonder where their fathers went wrong in raising them? Not sure same could be said about you at the moment
Either way goodnight gurl
Last edited by PasswordGotHacked; 02-11-2016 at 08:58 AM.
Reason: and feminists wonder why they get a bad name
02-11-2016
, 09:01 AM
02-11-2016
, 09:01 AM
A woman who disagrees principally because the other party is speaking about their sex regardless of facts presented and their limited (or non existent) knowledge of the topic at hand yes = blind feminism
If you can't see that dunno what to tell you. But you are just proving my point.
Anyway night. I'll be sure to check in in the morning
If you can't see that dunno what to tell you. But you are just proving my point.
Anyway night. I'll be sure to check in in the morning
02-11-2016
, 09:03 AM
02-11-2016
, 09:13 AM
Quote:
A woman who disagrees principally because the other party is speaking about their sex regardless of facts presented and their limited (or non existent) knowledge of the topic at hand yes = blind feminism
If you can't see that dunno what to tell you. But you are just proving my point.
Anyway night. I'll be sure to check in in the morning
If you can't see that dunno what to tell you. But you are just proving my point.
Anyway night. I'll be sure to check in in the morning
That's funny that this what you heard from me. What I actually said was,
~I'd rather a system were wrong on the side of protecting from abuse~
~I doubt Australians are dumb, and their woman abnormally immoral, compared both to other women AND the men from their same country~
02-11-2016
, 09:16 AM
02-11-2016
, 09:21 AM
