Haha, I've read the first 3 pages of your paper (just before empirical analysis) about 5 times now. I think it's great, but I find it a little bit awesome that you are explaining why you picked median instead of avarage. I mean, I'd think it was prety obvious, but that's just a random comment. I'm going to re-read everything I already read just for good measure and read all I haven't, but I think it looks pretty good so far (in case feedback is welcome, I dunno).
Feedback is welcome but possibly meaningless. I wrote that so long ago I barely remember it.
The thing about saying why I chose median instead of average was probably just to explain to the professor that I understand the concept of skewed distribution. The professor is the audience after all.
I dunno, that comment just reminded me of a (sort of) funny story when I once tried to explain to the head of the Linear Algebra department of my college that sigma squared meant variance, when she obv knew that.