Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Still time to buy gold imo. Still time to buy gold imo.

05-14-2010 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
London Bullion Market Association

Here's a GATA article about it.
+1

similar: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/11...a#post17810466

=======================
=======================

Quote:
I thought it might be a good time for an examination of the Dow Jones Industrials over the last ten+ years in comparison to gold given the fact that the stock market has seemingly recovered all of its losses incurred since last week’s 1000 point intraday plunge.
...

The current ratio [dow/gold] is closer to 8.7, a loss of 60% or so within the last three years alone. The peak reached eleven years ago was nearly 45. That totals a staggering loss in REAL TERMS of 80% in eleven years..

Another way of saying this is that a rising gold price is basically the same thing as a loss of purchasing power in the currency in which gold is priced. Gold is not so much rising as the Dollar is losing value. For that matter, nearly all of the fiat world currencies are losing value against gold.

... In REAL TERMS, stock market gains over the last decade, when compared to gold, have been as enduring as the morning mist.

This is why gold will never lose its allure. It truly is a store of value during times of economic and political uncertainty. Europe in particular is rediscovering this truth and it will be just a matter of time before the larger investing public here in the US does also.
Dow/Gold ratio
link
05-14-2010 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
LBMA AttACK!!

whack back

05-14-2010 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
What is happening today is truly fascinating. Gold has broken out to the upside even as the U.S. dollar has done likewise on the back of a renewed flight-to-safety bid. What this means, of course, is that gold has managed to hit new highs even as, (i) the U.S. dollar has risen, which means gold is breaking out against all major currencies; and, (ii) other industrial commodities, such as oil and copper, have slumped from their recent highs. So what this all means is that gold is no longer being considered as part of a resource complex that is outperforming the segment but is increasingly being viewed as a currency of its own.

Moreover, with the growth rate of fiat currencies globally being met with a skeptical eye by investors, especially now that we know that if the ECB, of all central banks, can engage in debt monetization (those clinging to the belief that this was modeled after the Bundesbank have been clearly duped), the one thing we do know about gold is that most of it is already above ground and that production peaked a decade ago. In other words, investors have more faith in what the shape and direction of the supply curve for bullion looks like relative to individual country money supply growth. This is why deflation is good for gold — the reflationary efforts provide a big boost. Even without the interventionist efforts to monetize the debts, as long as policy rates are near-zero, gold leasing rates will do likewise.

While FDR fixed the dollar price of gold in the 1930s, we know that bullion doubled in Sterling terms during that deflationary cycle. Gold is a hedge against instability of all kinds — don’t think for a second that deflation does not engender instability whether it be financial, economic or political. To be sure, gold is also a hedge against inflation — but that is going to come much, much later and will be the icing on the cake.
...
David Rosenberg Part 2: "Gold Is Increasingly Being Viewed As A Currency Of Its Own"
05-14-2010 , 03:19 PM
Oh noes gold's a bubble!

Or maybe not (from 12/09)

05-14-2010 , 03:31 PM
As multiples of the baselines, those four other peaks aren't all that dissimilar.
05-14-2010 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
As multiples of the baselines, those four other peaks aren't all that dissimilar.
Slopes imo.
05-14-2010 , 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
As multiples of the baselines, those four other peaks aren't all that dissimilar.
That's because they're all bubbles?
05-14-2010 , 05:29 PM
Yeah. And to think that there are otherwise smart people who think that gold is in a bubble right now...
05-14-2010 , 05:32 PM

Gold Commercial Short Positions Hit All Time High, As Gold Spike Protection Team Keeps Very Busy
Quote:
...It appears that last week the desire to suppress any gold breakouts was at historic highs, even as net commercial exposure hit a 2010 low of -282.6, just slightly higher than that seen in the second week of January. If even with this massive onslaught to keep gold low by the LBMA, the precious metal managed to nearly hit $1,250 today, what will happen to gold when the 450k commercial positions are forced to cover?
05-14-2010 , 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
Oh noes gold's a bubble!

Or maybe not (from 12/09)

What are the scales of that chart? What am I actually looking at?
05-14-2010 , 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
What are the scales of that chart? What am I actually looking at?
I believe they are all scaled to match the tops to indicate the rather steep ascents associated with popularly recognized "bubbles" of the past decade. I think its suggesting that bubble activity is associated with rather steep price ascensions, and further that a similar such ascension has not recently been seen in gold.

http://www.minyanville.com/businessm.../2009/id/25921
http://www.minyanville.com/businessm.../2009/id/25911
05-14-2010 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
What are the scales of that chart? What am I actually looking at?
Each line corresponds to the like-colored numbers on the sides. Like JR said they are made to be proportional to show the nature of a bubble. Although I wish they had set it so that gold $1250 was at the same height of the rest of the peaks.
05-14-2010 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
Ok I need some help reading this one. Do the red bars represent the total number of positions on gold held by commercial entities, and the blue line represents how many of those are short positions?

Or do the red bars represent total number of positions on gold (held by anyone), and the blue line is how many of those are commercial shorts?

halp!
05-14-2010 , 06:50 PM
Red bars = net position (i.e. total longs - total shorts), use left hand scale (its a negative number on the left indicating net commercial interest is short).

Black and blue line = total shorts, use right hand scale (its a positive number).

Obviously there are net long non-commercial investors to balance this out. Big point being the commercials are naked shorting, as they don't have the metal to be net this short.
05-14-2010 , 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
Oh noes gold's a bubble!

Or maybe not (from 12/09)

I'm having a hard time reading those axis graphs.... can anyone tell me what the Y axis is?

The X axis looks like 1998 to present?

But what is that Y one? Are they not all different scales? Can't one make the gold "bubble" look just as bad as the others by simply changing the gold's Y-axis (stretching it out a bit)?

In other words, if they're all on different Y-scales, can't you make the graph look how you want it to?

Darn... someone already asked this it seems

Last edited by DPatty; 05-14-2010 at 06:53 PM. Reason: Slow Pony :(
05-14-2010 , 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottySo
Each line corresponds to the like-colored numbers on the sides. Like JR said they are made to be proportional to show the nature of a bubble. Although I wish they had set it so that gold $1250 was at the same height of the rest of the peaks.
+1
05-14-2010 , 06:58 PM
Wow, good find with the graph.

Do these guys have to cover if they're the TBTF banks though? Aren't they sort of going to be allowed to keep their short positions? I've always thought banks can basically decide when to have margin calls on their client's positions, but if this position is being taken by a big bank itself then can they simply "not call it in"?

For a laymen like myself though, I can certainly appreciate the "wow" of having gold hit an all-time high in spite of all this net-short action. Cool stuff.
05-14-2010 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DPatty
Do these guys have to cover if they're the TBTF banks though?
ponder:

Will the other side of the trade (the long) demand delivery?

Will the Comex/LBMA other exchanges alter rules to allow/require paper settlement (i.e. cash premiums or settlement with shares in GLD/SLV) in soem/many contracts? The Comex has already altered rules, like allowing settlement in GLD/SLV in efp transactions (remember, JPM is custodian for SLV and HSBC the custodian for GLD) and has also altered rules to make it harder (more expensive and/or time consuming) to take delivery.

Are big short holders offering cash premiums over the contract value to long holders to settle without demanding delivery? Are these cash premiums funded in part by ZIRP and other liquidity measures?

Have and/or will central banks lease gold at below market rates to big banks who get stuck net naked short (a rumored explanation for brown's bottom) and can't deliver?

Are these "paper" markets in any way reflective of the real demand/ availability for physical bullion at these price levels?
05-14-2010 , 07:22 PM
Interesting to compare price movements for PHYS to GLD, COMEX & spot.
05-14-2010 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DPatty
I'm having a hard time reading those axis graphs.... can anyone tell me what the Y axis is?

The X axis looks like 1998 to present?

But what is that Y one? Are they not all different scales? Can't one make the gold "bubble" look just as bad as the others by simply changing the gold's Y-axis (stretching it out a bit)?

In other words, if they're all on different Y-scales, can't you make the graph look how you want it to?

Darn... someone already asked this it seems
Tech bubble: 50% rise/year
Housing bubble: 55% rise/year
China bubble: 245% rise/year
Crude bubble: 32% rise/year (76% in the last 1.5 years)

Gold "bubble": 18% rise/year

But, yeah, the graph is not very enlightening.
05-15-2010 , 04:02 AM
lol i go to the bank today to do my wire to buy gold and the representative there who was helping me with my wire asks me some basic questions about where the moneys going etc and discovers that the wire is for the purchase of gold. She then suggests to me that I consider looking into investing with their bank as they've got great specials going and offering 3% interest on savings accounts. she also pointed out to me that buying so much money worth of jewelry in these times might not be in my best interest. Thanks!
05-15-2010 , 04:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
Interesting to compare price movements for PHYS to GLD, COMEX & spot.
Those premiums aren't likely to decrease anytime soon either.


Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
lol i go to the bank today to do my wire to buy gold and the representative there who was helping me with my wire asks me some basic questions about where the moneys going etc and discovers that the wire is for the purchase of gold. She then suggests to me that I consider looking into investing with their bank as they've got great specials going and offering 3% interest on savings accounts. she also pointed out to me that buying so much money worth of jewelry in these times might not be in my best interest. Thanks!
Nice, thx for sharing.
05-15-2010 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
lol i go to the bank today to do my wire to buy gold and the representative there who was helping me with my wire asks me some basic questions about where the moneys going etc and discovers that the wire is for the purchase of gold. She then suggests to me that I consider looking into investing with their bank as they've got great specials going and offering 3% interest on savings accounts. she also pointed out to me that buying so much money worth of jewelry in these times might not be in my best interest. Thanks!
Last week I had to get a cashier's check for my purchase. Got the same basic questions. When the teller figured out I was buying gold..."Wow, is your wife OK with you spending this much money on it?"
05-15-2010 , 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
Production costs of gold are around $800/oz, so consider that the absolute floor at this point. Further, if gold were to fall by that amount, it would be in the context of the greatest bout of deflation the world would have ever seen...we'd be back down to Dow 1500 as well.
Labour theory of value revival tour?

      
m