Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
The thing you have to remember is that the mainstream media is an entirely corporate ecology. The mainstream financial media was and still is to a large extent an exercise in corporate PR whose purpose is to buoy stock prices and sell advertising to companies that depend on bullish markets like Charles Schwab, e-trade, you name it. That is slowly changing as the players in this space slowly realize that to retain viewers they have to retain some credibility, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to sell sunshine and rainbows.
Ok, but the media being a corporate schill-machine isn't, by itself, sufficient. If people understood money a little better, the media of the last 20 years wouldn't have been able to move markets as it did. Imagine if every person in the country read What Has Government Done to our Money, how differently thing would have played out.
I agree, the media will have to change to retain credibility. The more people educate themselves about money, economics, FRB, the Fed, etc, the greater that change will be. And if (when?) people really do become educated about these ideas, the pot will really start to boil. But (and this has sort of been my point all along), this is going to be a
very different process than how housing bursted. It won't be a mass realization that colossal amounts of funds have been inefficiently diverted into a particular market. It's going to be a mass realization that the very foundation of the market is built on quicksand.