Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Still time to buy gold imo. Still time to buy gold imo.

09-30-2010 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuvnorJimmy
Anyone seeing a short-term pullback in silver? I have another chunk to invest and would like a little drop...my gut is telling me it might not happen.
It's going to consolidate soon imo. How much of a consolidation off the trend support crack not sure of though. But something maybe similar to 12-04-09 in gold imo
09-30-2010 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonfiction
Great, I finally get enough mobnies saved up to finally get some gold/silver and now they both exploded this month
Ok, adding to this, I have enough spare monies to either get a 1/2 ounce of gold now, or an ounce in 2 weeks. If I wind up getting the 1/2 ounce coin now, I probably wind up buying another 1/2 ounce in 2 weeks anyways. Obviously a 1/2 ounce coin haa a higher premium compared to an ounce, but with the ridiculous price increases of the last month, if I wait 2 weeks I might wind up paying the same amount or more anyways. Of course, gold might also drop a bunch and then I would get it for cheaper. Any suggestions? I would be getting either the 1/2 ounce krug or the 1 ounce krug from apmex.
09-30-2010 , 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
IMO freegold as monetary functions separate.
If everything else goes to hell, I hope you're right.



Quote:
Can you provide a little more color here?
Let's say (hypothetically) that a couple of the major currencies- USD and EUR, through various forms of monetization, ridiculous debt loads leading to defaults (or more monetization) fail as a store of value (or as a store of real purchasing power) over any reasonable term. Some others, say CNY, JPY, CHF, whatever (since this is hypothetical) are not mismanaged. The world starts using these currencies (like Zimbabweans just started using foreign currencies for everything in place of the ZWN) instead of the imploding USD and EUR. Obviously gold is >> holding USD or EUR while this happens, since it retains real purchasing power (posting big nominal gains and probably some smaller real gains) while the currency is losing it, but the same can be said to a first approximation for physical copper, oil, or anything else whose use is functional (although barrels of oil are harder to store LDO).

Once this path is clear- the world converting to another currency (or an entirely new non-commodity-backed currency, whatever) that is actually functional (for now) as a store of value, what happens to gold?

There's no particular reason to keep it in large amounts- CNY/CHF/JPY are serving the function and they're more liquid. There's no particular reason for people to buy more in the short term. The real price should take a massive dump here relative to copper/oil/etc. I'm not saying it's a bubble (in terms of real purchasing power), or that it's wrong to buy/own NOW even if it does turn out to be a bubble, but I see real scenarios where it can take a massive dump in the future if the world converts to something other than PM-backed.
09-30-2010 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
but the same can be said to a first approximation for physical copper, oil, or anything else whose use is functional
This is what gold is - a store of real world value. Gold is not really used "functionally", which good thing for it being a store of value vis-a-vie other options.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
(although barrels of oil are harder to store LDO).
exactly.
09-30-2010 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
This is what gold is - a store of real world value. Gold is not really used "functionally", which good thing for it being a store of value vis-a-vie other options.
Sure, but the nominal price of gold has quadrupled in the last 8 years. The purchasing power of cash has not gone down 75% . With $1300 today, I can buy far more commodities today than I could with $300 8 years ago. Gold has clearly appreciated massively vs. a copper/oil/lead/zinc/aluminum portfolio over that timeframe. Why? I would expect that the relative gain here is largely because of increased demand for it as a store of value in the face of fiat uncertainty. Now what happens if the current bout of fiat uncertainty dies down and gold doesn't remonetize? Gold should take a dump relative to other commodities since demand for it as a store will fall.
09-30-2010 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
Sure, but the nominal price of gold has quadrupled in the last 8 years. The purchasing power of cash has not gone down 75%. With $1300 today, I can buy far more commodities today than I could with $300 8 years ago.
You're sorta comparing apples to oranges but that's another matter.

The big idea I think we can agree on is that gold has appreciated in purchasing power terms relative to a fiat currency like the dollar in recent times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
I would expect that the relative gain here is largely because of increased demand for it as a store of value in the face of fiat uncertainty. Now what happens if the current bout of fiat uncertainty dies down and gold doesn't remonetize? Gold should take a dump relative to other commodities since demand for it as a store will fall.
Exactly - the primary demand for gold is monetary, and this is what distinguishes gold from other "more commodity like" commodities. Which is why if the dollar was well managed (assuming it could be so), gold would not be doing what it is doing.

But I think we got into this discussion because of the assumption of the opposite occurring - that the dollar would die, but that also somehow gold wouldn't monetize? I believe you wrote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley View Post
So what happens if current currency goes to **** and it doesn't monetize and we wind up with fiat 2.0 as the world's major currency?
That's what i thought we were discussing - a situation in which the dollar dies but gold doesn't monetize and we just have another new fiat reserve currency? Which is why I asked for clarification of what you meant.

And then we sorta got onto a tangent not about a new fiat currency v. gold as a store of value if the dollar fails (which is what i thought we were originally addressing), and instead seem to be on a tangent about gold v. other physical commodities if the dollar fails.

===========

The big point is that, hypothetical scenarios aside, I am not aware of a reason to expect a new fiat currency to simply appear and replace the dollar's functionality.

That we could theorize it occurring is one thing, but the discussion is well past that point, and is focused on what will or is likely to happen.

The reason why I expect a free gold market to emerge is because I don't think that the existing monetary reserve structure can be continued in a different from.

So I sorta feel like we are backtracking here - the point you are making about a "hypothetical replacement currency regime" is fundamental to why I hold the expectations I do about gold.
09-30-2010 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonfiction
Ok, adding to this, I have enough spare monies to either get a 1/2 ounce of gold now, or an ounce in 2 weeks. If I wind up getting the 1/2 ounce coin now, I probably wind up buying another 1/2 ounce in 2 weeks anyways. Obviously a 1/2 ounce coin haa a higher premium compared to an ounce, but with the ridiculous price increases of the last month, if I wait 2 weeks I might wind up paying the same amount or more anyways. Of course, gold might also drop a bunch and then I would get it for cheaper. Any suggestions? I would be getting either the 1/2 ounce krug or the 1 ounce krug from apmex.
i bought ~40oz of silver yesterday, which was just about at a 2-year peak.

lots of people selling yesterday as i stood around and bull****ted. thought to myself, 'i'm probably doing it wrong here', but then thought i ain't selling it anyway, so who cares.

buy it now, buy another half in 2 weeks. if you can predict what's going to happen in that short of a term, you wouldn't be buying only halves right now, right?

funny how easy it is to get melt price lowered on 90% now that it's so high.

'wellll, melt's at about 15.8x face right now'

'yeah, you and i BOTH know you're not charging that..'
09-30-2010 , 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.
You're sorta comparing apples to oranges but that's another matter.

The big idea I think we can agree on is that gold has appreciated in purchasing power terms relative to a fiat currency like the dollar in recent times.

Exactly - the primary demand for gold is monetary, and this is what distinguishes gold from other "more commodity like" commodities. Which is why if the dollar was well managed (assuming it could be so), gold would not be doing what it is doing.
Agreed- that's why I own PMs and I have no current short-term plans to unload any.

Quote:
But I think we got into this discussion because of the assumption of the opposite occurring - that the dollar would die, but that also somehow gold wouldn't monetize? I believe you wrote:

That's what i thought we were discussing - a situation in which the dollar dies but gold doesn't monetize and we just have another new fiat reserve currency? Which is why I asked for clarification of what you meant.
Right.

Quote:
And then we sorta got onto a tangent not about a new fiat currency v. gold as a store of value if the dollar fails (which is what i thought we were originally addressing), and instead seem to be on a tangent about gold v. other physical commodities if the dollar fails.
Well, you have to benchmark the value of gold against something to talk about real purchasing power. Saying ZOMG my gold is worth 100000000000000000000000000000 zimbabwe dollars doesn't really mean anything without the prices of other things to compare that to. I picked the purchasing power relative to functional commodities as a proxy for general purchasing power because it's easy to find charts, although I don't think you're getting a different answer unless you compare to something very specific. Gold hasn't just appreciated in dollar terms (which may or may not be an increase in real purchasing power), but it has also appreciated significantly relative to "the average of all other stuff". 1oz of gold now gets you more usable stuff than 1oz of gold 8 years ago.

Quote:
The big point is that, hypothetical scenarios aside, I am not aware of a reason to expect a new fiat currency to simply appear and replace the dollar's functionality.

That we could theorize it occurring is one thing, but the discussion is well past that point, and is focused on what will or is likely to happen.

The reason why I expect a free gold market to emerge is because I don't think that the existing monetary reserve structure can be continued in a different from.

So I sorta feel like we are backtracking here - the point you are making about a "hypothetical replacement currency regime" is fundamental to why I hold the expectations I do about gold.
Yeah, I'm not saying that such a thing will happen, or is even likely to happen. My post is more along the lines of.. if this is looking like the probable path, it's time to unload gold, right?
09-30-2010 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
Yeah, I'm not saying that such a thing will happen, or is even likely to happen. My post is more along the lines of.. if this is looking like the probable path, it's time to unload gold, right?
Yup. I'm not sure its possible, but if it hypothetically were and this outcome was probable, than yup.
10-01-2010 , 08:33 AM
$1319 this morning. This rally is stunning.
10-01-2010 , 09:26 AM
Quote:
The copies of gold and silver inflated which after the theft never thrown into the lake. At their discovery all is exhausted and dissipated by the debt. All scrips and bonds will be wiped out.
the seer guy supposedly wrote that a long time ago
10-01-2010 , 09:47 AM
Quote:
9/29/10 (Telegraph.co.uk) — Stimulus leaking out of the West’s stagnant economies is flooding into emerging markets, playing havoc with their currencies and economies. Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Colombia, Korea, Taiwan, South Africa, Russia and even Poland are either intervening directly in the exchange markets to prevent their currencies rising too far, or examining what options they have to stem disruptive inflows.

Peter Attard Montalto from Nomura said quantitative easing by the US Federal Reserve and other central banks is incubating serious conflict. “It is forcing money into emerging market bond funds, and to a lesser extent equity funds. There has truly been a wall of money entering many countries,” he said.

“I worry that we are on the cusp of a competitive race to the bottom as country after country feels they need to keep up.”

… Japan has begun intervening to stop the yen appreciating to heartburn levels for Toyota, Sharp, Sony and other exporters.

… Switzerland spent 80bn francs in one month to stem capital flight from the euro, only to be defeated by the force of the exchange markets, leaving its central bank nursing huge losses.
..
Quote:
RS View: We’ve addressed this point many times. The U.S. does not want a strong dollar. But that being a consequence of a reserve currency, it is evident from the weak-currency attitudes of everyone else that nobody else wants to step into the dollar’s shoes and have their own currency relatively strengthened by serving in that international reserve capacity. This is where the geopolitical neutrality of gold comes to the fore. As these international monetary tussles drag everyone deeper into a mire of collective currency depreciation, gold alone stands above the fray as the one agreeable thing that everyone can continue to count on as a rock solid reserve asset.

And on that score, I note that the price of gold held up well today and didn’t relax until AFTER the European Central Bank took its valuation “snapshot” of the price for purposes of quarterly mark-to-market revaluation of the reserves on its balance sheet. And whereas gold had reached a new record high in dollar terms, as denominated in euro it’s actually a bit softer now (€960) than it was for the previous quarter (€1010 @ June 30th). So this quarter will trim back some of the large revaluation gains registered in that previous quarter in which gold had elevated well above the €823/oz valuation mark established for the quarter ended March 31st which came atop the prior gains from the more important annual accounting MTM benchmark of €766 at the turn of the year 2009/2010. In case you’re wondering why this seemingly random or tangential spotlight has been offered on the ECB, the reason I’ve set out this paragraph is to help demonstrate (with hard evidence) the concluding point that I offered in the preceding paragraph about gold’s escalating role and importance as a reserve asset in the international monetary system.
link
10-01-2010 , 03:20 PM
pretty awesome that nonfict and i have been having a convo via pm about buying gold because we didn't want to clutter up the 'still time to buy gold' thread.
10-01-2010 , 09:44 PM
I don't know where to put this, but I thought it was interesting. I admit I don't know much about gold or silver.

http://www.economist.com/node/17151109


Quote:
Demand for silver is likely to keep rising in developing countries in particular: China, which used to export the metal, now imports it. The same cannot be said for supply. As Michael Lewis of Deutsche Bank points out, three-quarters of the world’s supply comes as a by-product from copper, lead and zinc mines. So ramping up production is difficult. Total supplies of the metal in 2009, at 27,650 tonnes, were barely higher than in 2004.


Quote:
On September 29th silver exceeded $22 an ounce, a price not seen since 1980 when the Hunt brothers, a pair of Texan oil barons, unwisely attempted to corner the market. Then silver spiked as high as $50 an ounce before the strategy unravelled, sending the price crashing and the Hunts back to the oil business.
10-02-2010 , 09:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItalianFX
I don't know where to put this, but I thought it was interesting. I admit I don't know much about gold or silver.

http://www.economist.com/node/17151109




Why did they pick some random date in 2008 to compare against gold? OH yeah, because silver had a massive pullback and gold had a minor pullback (relative to silver).

You can pick dates within a few months of the one they choose to show that gold has appreciated 30%+ over a period where silver has gone up <10%. Silver has been crazy volatile- don't listen to people who cherry pick their dates.
10-02-2010 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiper
pretty awesome that nonfict and i have been having a convo via pm about buying gold because we didn't want to clutter up the 'still time to buy gold' thread.
10-03-2010 , 06:21 PM
$1321 at the open tonight in Asia.
10-05-2010 , 08:22 AM
Hey there $1330. Silver also well over $22/oz now.
10-05-2010 , 10:54 AM
sick day today
10-05-2010 , 11:15 AM
Awesome, right after i bought my 1st golds
10-05-2010 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
Hey there $1330. Silver also well over $22/oz now.
pshhhhhhhhhhhh


1330 is so 4 hours and 10$ ago
10-05-2010 , 12:56 PM
I knew I shoulda bought more silver yesterday on that "dip"
10-05-2010 , 03:03 PM
inht'4pme6tnlob4mrynt;lmw#yn4vjwenrgbvpnwpbn3pb3me

I was gonna put a large amount in silver at like, 11.5 (sterling). It is now 14.3.

Anyone see a short-term drop?

For once I am actually seriously pissed off!!
10-05-2010 , 04:01 PM
are you guys buying the physical metal in silver too rather than the paper silver? buying something like 50k worth of silver would be rather hefty
10-05-2010 , 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
are you guys buying the physical metal in silver too rather than the paper silver? buying something like 50k worth of silver would be rather hefty
I buy physical gold and unallocated silver. You save tax on silver in Britain. An unallocated er silvaccount is fine with the big gold and silver suppliers. I am not sure about gold though. There are stories of plenty of sales where the physical might/does not exist. Always take your gold in bullion.

      
m