Quote:
Originally Posted by lolposting2016
Small 4b sizing is std you have so much strong stuff and it’s v easy to comfortably get stacks in with aa/kk in like almost every board
+1
2.3x or so is good imo.
maybe Cheese has a point as well about OOP vs IP (def agree that that 4x 3b size is slightly big IP) idk, i wouldn't adjust 4b size too much more than 2.7x OOP normally, I think it just ends up doing the wrong kinds of things.
in terms of positives for 2.3x... good price on bluff and makes it tempting but wrong for vil to call with trash (not by a ton, but still wrong). if the sizing seems wrong then I think it's largely bc we are either mis-constructing our own 4b range, or mis-adjusting to vils 3b range. (kind of the same thing sometimes I guess.)
psa in this hand 4bet to 260, 3bet 95, 165 to call into 520 = 32% equity needed to call.
if we 4b AK,JJ+ and all As/wheel vil has odds on...
{ 22+,A2s+,KTs+,Q8s+,J9s+,T8s+,97s+,86s+,76s,65s,A5o + }
Vils issue is two fold imo
1) every hand in our range over realizes equity vs this calling range at low SPR
and
2) I don't have the math in front of me, but I feel like every time I've done the math in the past if we aren't 4bing vs 2%3bers (i.e. not constructing dumb ranges) we profit slightly from FE pre anyway
I guess another way of saying what I'm saying about ranges is if vil calls 4b too much we could easily just 4b
AK,JJ+.A5s,A4s
and vil only has odds on
{ 22+,A2s+,KQs,QTs+,76s,ATo+ } and still runs into the same issues with equity realization
Last edited by sungar78; 05-17-2018 at 06:32 PM.