Quote:
Originally Posted by Daft_Punk
So spot was a cooler, v snap calls and tables 55 for the winning hand. I check the turn on a lot of cards for some of the reasons mentioned above, but the 4 seems to be a really good card for me to barrel on. Do you guys agree on that, pr what are your thoughts?
On the river, I'm check calling a jam with value and I'm jamming for value/bluff the rest of the time. I should have more bluffs by the river than him so I thought taking this line was appropriate.
I stand by my first post. I think it's too thin/greedy in a typical 2/5 game to try to get stacks in this deep with this hand on this run out. So no, I don't like a bet on the turn, I think it actually makes more sense to bet cards that he might have picked up equity with (like a non-rainbow 6, 7, or 8) - The reason being on a dry board like this another bet is going to fold out too many hands you beat... and even the ones that call are going to have a hard time calling the river. Going for 2 streets of value on flop/river instead just makes more money vs. worse and saves more money vs. better imo. Now if the turn was that non-rainbow 7, we have a whole lot more worse hands that can call a bet - 66, 88, any Tx with a flush draw.
Also worth nothing - if you're in a similar spot in the future and worse overpairs are in their range then that changes a lot. But in this spot... our v never has QQ and has very little JJ.