Jam is better than other sizes. We don't have no equity bluffs here, we also don't have much fold equity (and worse still, can get jammed on) with a small sizing, so we don't want to use that sizing with our bluffs (whatever they may be), so there's no real reason why we should pick a small sizing.
Villain is going to have sets or NFD/combo draws a lot, and against that range, there's just too much value to jam. We don't really need this hand in our range to facilitate call downs on bricks. Just pick a different hand we arrive on river that works as a bluff catch. It's not like if we flat here, our opponent would suddenly be making a mistake value betting a set, or that he'd be punished for it (since sets would call a jam on turn anyway, his sets actually lose LESS money if we call straights on the turn) so there's no real purpose in having it in our call range.
Quote:
Jamming seems way too big here. We'd be putting in >4.5k on top of his 900 turn bet. What do we expect him to call with?
Yeah if it's that easy to fold people off hands, I don't see why you wouldn't just jam all your draws on the turn.
Ask yourself this, what would call a 2.2k raise but fold to a 4.5k?
That's right, DRAWS. The EXACT HANDS we don't want to give good odds to.
If villain has two pairs, what reason would he have to continue to 2.2k, and then fold on a brick, but not 4.5k?
I actually don't know why people are so allergic to making big raises. It's exactly like the live tournament players who complain when you shove 14bbs on the button and tell you how much of an overbet your raise is.