Quote:
Originally Posted by NC82
Keep in mind that variance in LHE is actually higher than in NLHE
Ugh I hate it when people say it like this.
For two games where the blinds are equal (1/2 NL vs 2/4 LHE), LHE has less variance.
For two games where the variance is equal (1/2 NL vs 5/10-6/12 LHE), NL has the higher potential winrate.
For two games where the potential winrate is equal (1/2 NL vs 10/20 LHE), NL has less variance.
But here's the thing - potential winrate doesn't equal personal winrate. Some people may be better at NL or better at LHE, or winners at one game while losers at the other.
Stating that one game has less variance than the other is pointless unless someone can crush both games equally. Switching to LHE because there's "less variance" is dumb, but as dumb as sticking with NL because there's "less variance."
The proper way to evaluate a game is to compare the ratio of win rate squared to variance (WR^2 / SD^2), which scales linearly with desirability (assuming WR is positive, obviously if you're a loser then not playing would be best).