Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
why are you hedging parlays? if you're gonna hedge just leave off the last game when you make the parlay.
A 3-teamer pays roughly 6/1 while a 2-teamer pays 13/5. Suppose you bet $100 to win $600 (total pay $700) on a 3-teamer and your first 2 hit. You now have $700 riding on the final game. Now you can bet $100 the other way to remove your downside risk. If you had just bet the first 2 your win would be $260.
So your outcomes on the 3-teamer w/hedge would be:
a) win/lose $0
b) win $500
whereas your outcomes on the 2-teamer that already hit would be to just win $260.
Yes, you could point out that the EV here is $250 compared to $260 on the 2-teamer that already hit, but I'd counter that to me personally the promise of a larger payout is more appealing. I know this might sound counter intuitive but I'm not playing with the grocery money and it's just how I like to do it.
I'd also add that I don't normally do a 2-teamer unless it's on the same game or simultaneous games. For non-simultaneous games, you'd be better off to bet the $100 on the first game then bet it all (initial $100 plus your winnings) on the 2nd game. There are some exceptions for me on this thinking, mainly having to do with UFC for reasons I'll have to explain later, but at the end of the day, I don't think parlays are a profitable play in general, I usually avoid them and typically just bet them when things are going really well or really poorly.