Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
Many/most people who try poker for a living just aren't as bright, emotionally stable or socially skilled as average people. Many/most are extremely gullible and have an inflated sense of themselves, including their ability to understand basic probability despite never having bothered to learn anything.
It is a selection problem. Most could not make it in the highly competitive field of fry cooking.
I disagree. I think most of those trying and failing at poker might actually be smarter than the
average person, and are not at all more gullible or egotistical or devoid of basic probability skills. Those coming from or only trying online poker, yes, are clearly less apt at social interaction (but better at the math), but I think we're talking about live poker here.
The problem is that, to make it as a pro, you need to be, on a scale of 1-10, a 9 or 10 for intelligence and emotional stability. Mere 6's and 7's will fail, whereas those same people are destined to rise through the management ranks at the local shopping mall.
Clearly I don't think much of the average intellect, but that's only because talking to almost anyone except a professional gambler reveals amazing shortcomings in probability appraisals and egotism. This includes business people, lawyers, doctors, etc. Behavioral psych and all that.
Poker just doesn't allow for incompetence the way that other careers do. The weak in poker are beaten down instead of brought slowly along from accrual of years in the biz.