Quote:
Originally Posted by thedude404
A lot to unpack here. First off everything the US government is not destroyed. People like to over generalize on this point. https://www.theacsi.org/news-and-res...nt-report-2017
Secondly, if the government did the "bare minimum" as you put it, we'd have no minimum wage, children working in factories, and raw waste coming out of factories. That is just for starters. In your mind, a country with fewer laws and regulations would be a libertarian utopia. But in reality it would be a society nobody would want to live in and actually a complete nightmare. If left unchecked, some people will do ANYTHING to make a dollar, whether it hurts or kills people. So that's why the libertarian ideal is and always will be, a complete failure. You act as if people will automatically look out for the other guy. Maybe YOU would. But that is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of how most people act in a pure capitalistic society. So that is the exact reason we do need laws. So capitalism doesnt ruin our society.
To your next point about preventive self care. To a point, I'll agree with you. America is full of fat slobs when compared to other first world countries. However, this does not address the fact that no matter how healthy you are, you will get older. Being healthy is great, but eventually just about everyone is going to get sick or have some sort of health issue no matter how healthy you are. So while you somewhat make a point, you really arent addressing the issue of paying for healthcare.
You said "Theoretically if insurance companies were non-profit and functioned as originally intended (a theoretical pot of money to which we all contribute and pool risk/resources), we'd probably be able to cover a ton of people"
That is exactly what a government run health care system is. So you're saying a system like that would work?
You also said "Government-funded health care simply means "citizen funded health care"- our tax dollars will go up and we pay more, and have the inefficient government waste the money to boot."
This is 100% incorrect. Take Canada for example. Their system is run by province. The government owns the hospitals and pays the workers. If you live in Ontario and make less than $20k a year, your healthcare tax is ZERO. It maxes out at ***$900*** a year if you make more than $200k a year. In some cases it's also funded partially by corp taxes and lottery revenue.
Ask ANY other 1st world country about their government run health care system. Sure, they arent perfect. But saying that there is no other better solution out there than what the USA has is just being willfully ignorant or just refusing to face the fact that something run by the government DOES work. Even you say we have the worst system in the 1st world.
What in the hell is wrong with people like you being so against something that we can witness working far better that our system in most other 1st world countries??????
Haven't logged in here in a while (since most topics on 2+2 are just boring/repetitive nowadays), but always lurk the TR's.
Anyway, above post is simply SPOT ON!
No government = No protection for those who actually need it!
To patronize what has been been working for decades in other developed countries = Ignorant!
Buy yeah, let's just shout MAGA and bury our heads in the sand...