Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Ungar
Fascinating how your early ones were so low budget and now you are playing some pretty decent stakes.
Is the big increase in stakes due to your job situation or just your poker improvement?
Definitely not job related. I don't even have one at the moment. I guess it's poker improvement.
Since this made me introspective, here's some thoughts:
I'm comfortable at the stakes (games where you buy in for ~3k) and am a decent winner over a medium sample (over 2400 hrs in the past two years, including almost 1000hrs of 40/80 in the last year, which is the bulk of my play).
For no limit, I think I'm generally pretty good at detaching myself from the money, thinking through spots quickly, and executing/not worrying too much about being wrong. I posted one "punt" where I stacked off $1500 on the turn out of the big blind with 88 on 7x4c2cT, but I also successfully called off a $600 pot-sized river bluff with A6 on KQ6K3 because villain's line made no sense and jammed T8hh through on the river on QJh47hA in a 3-way pot (of about $1500) after raising big on turn in a single-raised 3-way pot. I feel like if I posted any of these hands in LLSNL or a similar forum, people would think (and/or tell me) I'm terrible. I probably am, but--given what I saw in the Bellagio and Aria games--a lot of other people suck at poker too, and I'm willing to go for spots.
And for limit, I guess that I'm a decent reg at this point. I've run a lot of head up spots (mostly using cepheus solutions) and have a decent sense of what to value bet/raise and how to find bluffs. And I'm more willing to deviate than a lot of nitty pros, which has served me pretty well. I imagine I could get to the same place in NL, were I willing to put in the work.