Quote:
Originally Posted by DC2LV
I agree with your decision not to carry collision, and I'm not criticizing you for your decision not to carry comp, but if it has been approximately 10 years from when you discontinued coverage (not sure exactly what 10+ equates to) then there is absolutely zero chance that you've saved $1,500 ($150/yr) by not carrying comp itself. Comp coverage isn't that expensive; especially for a car that's only worth $1,500.
I'm currently paying $170 per year for my comp coverage in Miami on a 2014 Jaguar XJL that was $85k when new and is currently worth about $35k. And the cost of my automobile insurance went up when I moved from Las Vegas to Miami a few years ago.
That aside, my condolences on the loss of your car. Even though it wasn't a painful financial loss, it's always a pain in the ass when you have to unexpectedly replace a car and have to go out and buy a replacement vehicle as quickly as possible. I went through that last year when my wife totaled one of our cars.
I actually took the time to check the cost of comp where I had been living for the past 12 years. For my 1996 vehicle, it's $64 a year. for my same vehicle but the 2006 model, it's $144 a year. So yes, in all likely hood I i did not save $1500 over that time span so thank you so much for correcting me.
As far as if I should have been carrying comp all these years, I did some research on the internet. One line of thought said not to carry comp if you vehicle was over 10 years old. Another line of thought said to only carry comp AND collision if the combined rate was less than 10% of the vehicle value. So I still think I made the right decision.
So to sum up it looks like I would have come out a few hundred dollars ahead by carrying comp assuming I would have gotten $1500 from the insurance company. At this point $1500 doesnt mean very much to me either way, as it wouldn't allow me to fully purchase a vehicle or even pay a significant amount towards a vehicle in my price range.
Due to the fact that at this point I would be faced with purchasing a vehicle with between 50k-100k miles on it due to cost, I would be faced with the same proposition of having a vehicle that I would be more than likely having to dump money into for repairs and maintenance all while it's value is diminishing, I'm pretty certain that I will not be purchasing a new vehicle at all. Or at least trying out other options ie walking, public transportation, uber and see how that goes. I'm used to using public transportation even when I had a vehicle, so that won't be too much of a lifestyle change ie I know the level of inconvenience it can cause. I can always rent a vehicle for trips/vacations outside of town. The one big downfall will be not being able to go to areas not covered by public transportation that I frequented once or twice a month. So I guess over time I'll have to weigh the pro's and cons of not having a vehicle. That is, assuming my vehicle isnt recovered....
Last edited by thedude404; 07-31-2018 at 01:28 PM.