I'm sorry - I recognize I'm being snarky, but tone is hard to read on the internet and I read your post as kind of critical/OP and snarky in its own way, trying to educate someone in their TR about something pretty simple. So I'll take the time to offer a real response and explain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oriole-lion
Sometimes fish can tap the glass too! I was down $300 and literally 2 hands from getting up when the BB came to me.
You are reading this as "When the big blind came to me, I was 2 hands from getting up." The other way to read it, which is correct in context, is that OP is UTG+1 and was going to get up in two hands, at which point he would have to take the big if he did not get up. Not only is this the more straightforward and logical way to read the sentence, but in context it is painfully obvious OP did not play this hand in the BB:
Quote:
Originally Posted by oriole-lion
Good player to my right raised UTG to $18. I just called with JJ-I probably should be 3-betting, but just couldn’t hit water from a boat this session. Folds to SB, who is this young Asian kid that raised to $65.
OP cannot be in the BB because the "player to his right" its UTG (not in the SB); it is clear there is action behind OP when he flats with JJ as it then "folds to SB"; and then the SB raises to $65.
