Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Ungar
Trooper's Level 1 poker thinking rears its ugly head again. Calls with 44 looking to setmine, even though he "knew" that the player to his right wanted to raise, but didn't raise since the player was waiting for the action player to his left to raise..so the action player raises, the player to his right re-raises, and Trooper snap folds. "It was worth a shot"..lol.
I don't think I have ever seen someone play nearly every day for 3 years and is worse than he was 3 years ago..
This is 100% true and here's why: Trooper plays every single day (pretty often) but he doesn't do any studying, get coaching, or ever really sit down and analyze his play or his stats.
The only thing he does is think back on his play and JUSTIFY his moves with random, illogical theories to make himself feel better by explaining everything as a bad beat where he knew exactly what was going on. He is actually very results oriented where his analysis always finds a way to justify why his results are pure bad beats.
So what ends up happening by justifying the bad beats is that Trooper re-enforces bad decision making on the daily and over time, his poker decision making is getting worse and worse as he cements bad habits and never fixes any mistakes because in his mind, he NEVER makes any mistakes.
So you have an average player (Trooper 3 years ago) slowly cement tons of bad poker habits and never fix a leak because he fails to identify them and he is just getting worse and worse as time goes on.
The results prove it too. Most poker players gets better to a degree by seeing lots of hands play out, fixing leaks, and then analyzing their play to re-enforce the positive and eliminate the negative. Trooper does the exact opposite!
He re-enforces the negative (since it's all just bad beats) and doesn't analyze the positive (since he just figures it's all his great reads.)
That's why he is actually a worse player from 3 years ago.
Same thing happens at my former workplace. We used to train new hires the basics and then let them go off and do the work to learn the intermediate and advanced stuff. There was no monitoring of their progress or checking-in to see that they are doing the process correctly 3/6/12 months down the road. The hires end up coasting by on sub-par work unless they make a MAJOR mistake and crap hits the fan. It's actually a pretty common problem in lots of bad work environments.