Quote:
Originally Posted by prev
he said that he was only like -110 or something when he was talking about all the coolers he had, and also ended up playing more than 8 hours a day during his failed hours challenge, he still grinded to basically even and anything above 8 hours is still solid imo.
He named hands not coolers . Maybe one was a cooler. The rest were just cry baby nit stuff.
He just doesn't get people aren't putting money in against him light or without a big draw bc he's such a giant nit unless they only have like 50 bucks. He thinks it's a coincidence when he stacks top pair type hands they have 50 bucks. So yea KJ will call ten pre and on a 5 way flop lose their their 40 bucks with top pair but almost nobody is going that against him for full buy ins.
His method is absolutely better than tilting your face off and dumping tons of money. But it's so much worse than actually pushing edges and dealing well with the swings. It doesn't have to be either or.
It's the same kind of "logic" he has with money. He acts like the choices are make a lot more money and blow it all or make scraps and spend next to nothing. Again that is the either/or in his head.
He overall volume those 4 days was fine although well short of his challenge. But his last day he got set over set very early on in the session and went running back to his hotel room. Again better than tilting and playing like an idiot but way worse than just shrugging your shoulders and playing well after.
The issue isn't breaking even over 40 hours. Obviously anyone can break even or lose over 40 hours it means nothing. The issue is playing so scared he only has teeny tiny swings leaving a ton of money on the table in the process.
I mean we've all broken even over 40 hours. But the max high point and max low point during that stretch shouldn't be +/- 2 buy ins.
Last edited by borg23; 02-25-2024 at 03:54 PM.