Quote:
Originally Posted by RidePolaris
Shockingly low? His hourly rates range from $11.xx to $23.xx. At the $1-$2 or $1-$3 level I wouldn't exactly call those "shockingly low". You know the rake eats up $15 - $20 per hour, right? Any rooms where he's logged less than 250 hours shouldn't be counted due to a lack of statistically significant sample size. You know this. You do.
If he wants to increase his hourly, should he move up to the $2-$5 level? Yes, but to say his rates at the lowest games spread are shockingly low is a slap in the face to anyone who knows the typical hourlies at those blinds.
The winrate actually makes a lot of sense. If he was beating the games for a lot more, he would be a much better and more knowledgeable player, and he would be more confident playing at higher stakes. Continuing to play the lowest stakes would be dumb.
In other words, if he was crushing the lower stakes, the temptation to move up would be a lot greater (and his bankroll would be much bigger so it would be less stressful).
But here we see he doesn’t crush them. He beats the stakes he plays at, so he does okay. But if he is just doing okay, is he really going to feel comfortable moving up and playing tougher competition?