So now Trooper thinks just because he was profitable Colluding STT with a partner that he can profit enough by himself to grind them all day at the WSOP.

Its always funny how wide he opens his eyes when he is skateboarding on the streets. lol

reason being he needs glasses..you heard it hear first.

its amazing he has no desire to play in a smaller buy in at wsop and try and hit it big
trooper grinding satellites is break even at best,broke by end of summer

Wonder if he'll punt another $550 this summer in a Heads Up tournament..

Elvis has entered the building



Man all we need is Viggo in the game and I'm catching next flight out!

Hate to burst your bubble, but the Chase IHG free night can only be used at hotels valued at 40k points or lower. The Venetian/Palazzo usually run at 60k.

I think the cut off was May this year, so if you applied for your card before May you might be good for one more year staying at a more expensive property.

That limitation came after I signed up so I am aware of it. However I thought I could use it this year. It doesn’t matter anyways.

Cut off was April 5th. I know bc I applied on April 6th. Still, 40k is still a good room. Also, you can get 80k pts if you spend 2k in 1stv3 months. Very doable.

is Viggo a doctor yet? in the few vlogs I watched from him he seemed like he meant well. also don't think i ever saw a losing session

Trooper is bat **** ****ing crazy if he thinks he will be grinding SNGs all summer...

He will lose his first 4 or 5 and then quit.

That was brutal! I would have been on massive tilt after that.

I'm confused about Bikekings stats why does he have March graph data with 16k bankroll when a few vlogs ago he stated he only had an $800 bankroll. I mean I like his vlogs cuz they are fun and goofy but his stats all over the map.

His weight loss challenge lasted longer LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

swapping action isn't colluding

What about swapping action and sitting in the same satellite?

Any response Tim @BONG_POT?

Catching up on prior Johnny Vibes vlogs after reading comments here. Dude is a maniac.

Texting his wife about losing 6k.



Excellent vlogs!

Bike went on an unbelievable, massive heater a couple of months ago and ran that $800 up to 16k.

Lol jk. He explained in one of his previous vlog's comments section that it's a glitch with the poker app he uses, so to ignore that 16k figure. He said Brad Owen has that issue too and has an inaccurate bankroll figure on his app.

That was hard to hear his explanation on the A6 hand where he 5 bets his opponent. He said his only will continue AA,KK,QQ, and AK. He said he blocks AA and AK. Well, let’s see...There’s 3 combos of AA left, 12 combos of AK, 6 combos of KK, 6 combos of QQ. So that’s 27 combos that will continue. He’s blocking 3 combos of AA and 4 combos of AK. So out of 34 possible of combos of AA, KK, QQ, and AK, he’s only removing 7 combos.

I feel sometimes players misapply the concept of blockers. When you block only a only small fraction of your opponents continuing hands, you need to proceed carefully.

Call me a nit, but the times I use blockers are dry ace or have a pair that blocks an opponent’s straight possibility in plo. That’s assuming my hand has no show down value.

I agree with your opinion of misapplying a concept as blockers pimp, but Vibes was obviously tilted in this session and reaching the end of his rope, and i dont think he is totally serious when he was trying to explain/defend his spazz in that session when he lost $6200 in short period of time.

If you asked him the day after he filmed that vlog, i would guess that he totally agree with what you are saying, and that his weak arguments for the spazz with A6 doesent hold any true value in a serious poker debate.

Spot on petrucci.

On a side note, trooper table talk in his latest video doesn’t make sense. Seems like he’s trying to make the game awkward and players uncomfortable. You can see it in the players face reaction.

He doesn't talk at all about what his opponent's 4betting range is outside of QQ+/AK. Blockers matter because they affect the ratio of continuing hands to folding hands. It's possible that blockers only matter against an opponent capable of a 4bet bluff in this spot. Did he make any sort of case that his opponent even had a 4bet bluff range?

Lol, thanks for the tip- always crack me up to watch the trainwreck of the Trooper vlogs. Especially when he goes on a big blowup for something completely random, or when he talks about "fish in the game who is ready to lose several hundred dollars". Says the man who repeatedly blows off 700-800 dollars in 1-2 games.

Yeah, and I believe that Trooper interprets those uncomfortable reactions as people laughing. I think his social cues are all ****ed up

Troop has the moves.