Quote:
Originally Posted by Playbig2000
It amazes me how many players don't think a coach can have a positive effect on their game. That's a good thing for the longevity of winning poker. I don't know if people are saying becoming good "comes from within" as a troll, but I used to think I was a good player until around 2010 when coaches turned my game around literally. I probably have the most coached hours itt by far (which was funded by poker profits). No offense to Mat or David but you can't learn the concepts which are needed to be a top winning player from books alone. However, there are very few good live poker coaches that are able to take a player from break even/slight winner to a total crusher and a lot more people offering coaching who aren't remotely qualified to take money for poker advice such as the one who coached Trooper's friend (I'm not going to mention any names : / )
I'm going to still disagree and no, I'm not trolling (though I don't understand the "comes from within" **** either). I think winning at poker is more a matter of the mindset you are born with and how large your bankroll is.
If you are risk adverse OR not comfortable with a lot of variance I don't think you will be able to win at this game no matter how skilled you become at other aspects of it.
More times than I can count when I watch Andrew's videos and he gives commentary on what hands the villain is likely to have or not have I think to myself "well, Andrew doesn't play in my games because they can show up with any two cards where I play" and they do. I certainly understand the value in hand reading skills, but when your opponents are just as likely to have AK as 2-4 on an A-3-5 board I'd like to meet a coach that can teach you to discern between the two.
If you don't mind tons and tons of variance and have the bankroll to ride it out then I suppose a coach could possibly teach you to find all the +EV situations and exploit those to the best of your ability, but I just don't think so.