Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshka
Good thing the WSOP main event is a live event cause Pman has a -38.2% ROI in online tourneys.
Yes, Thirty eight point two percentage.
In other words, for every $10 you buy into a tourney, you get back $6.18.
For every $100 you buy into a tourney, you get back $61.80.
For every $1000 you buy into a tourney, you get back $618.
Diesel has taught me that this is a the best way to explain such complex things.
If you'd like, I can break down the return for every $10000 as well but I'll stop at three.
https://pokerprolabs.com/players/pmanprays/888.nj
c'mon guys
at the risk getting flamed by the thread...
it's unfair to judge a sample that small
his buyins are all over the place as well so simply cashing instead of busting just one of the higher dollar ones he played would have a very different roi number
and even if he is a long term -38% roi player, that's only below average after you account for rake, take his most commonly played game, the $5 blast, which must be raked absurdly high if they give everyone 10% cashback on entries
let's pretend it's a genuine sample that can be trusted, i would imagine these results are in line with the field in general, in fact, probably in the top 50%
given how much tougher online is, that would mean he has a slight edge in live games if he's able to table select well
but mostly, it's really messed up that you guys are treating a meaningless sample size as meaningful just because it confirms your belief, if he were crushing you'd be posting "fish on a heater, wait until the poor guy realizes his actual equity once he gets a real sample in"
can't have it both ways