Yup you got the bullseye again bro,all the reg posters in this thread posting about the clown shows that is Trooper, El Diesel and Pman is diagnosed with personality disorders.

In fairness while Joe Mcewing played a lot of positions he didn't play any of them particularly well. He had a negative defensive value for his career.

Rice being the McEwing of the Orleans is probably a good comparison. Surprised he didn't declare himself the Ben Zobrist of the room.

Good thing the WSOP main event is a live event cause Pman has a -38.2% ROI in online tourneys.

Yes, Thirty eight point two percentage.

In other words, for every $10 you buy into a tourney, you get back $6.18.

For every $100 you buy into a tourney, you get back $61.80.

For every $1000 you buy into a tourney, you get back $618.

Diesel has taught me that this is a the best way to explain such complex things.

If you'd like, I can break down the return for every $10000 as well but I'll stop at three.

https://pokerprolabs.com/players/pmanprays/888.nj

Wow he'd be better off playing Keno.

Yea, she has a lot of cashes but she also plays a lot of tournaments, there is some decent scores listed, nothing major, she is probably break even after travel costs/etc.

https://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/pla...p?a=r&n=263965

I guess pokerprolabs doesn't have info after the tri state merge and those names a month or so ago, not that that would make Pman's numbers any better probably.

TBF, like 1/3 of Pmans ROI is coming from those Blast games that are under $1. However, it looks like he's played one as high as $20, which to me is akin to playing Blackjack.

c'mon guys

at the risk getting flamed by the thread...

it's unfair to judge a sample that small

his buyins are all over the place as well so simply cashing instead of busting just one of the higher dollar ones he played would have a very different roi number



and even if he is a long term -38% roi player, that's only below average after you account for rake, take his most commonly played game, the $5 blast, which must be raked absurdly high if they give everyone 10% cashback on entries


let's pretend it's a genuine sample that can be trusted, i would imagine these results are in line with the field in general, in fact, probably in the top 50%




given how much tougher online is, that would mean he has a slight edge in live games if he's able to table select well


but mostly, it's really messed up that you guys are treating a meaningless sample size as meaningful just because it confirms your belief, if he were crushing you'd be posting "fish on a heater, wait until the poor guy realizes his actual equity once he gets a real sample in"

can't have it both ways

The online tourney stats were more of a joke than serious post in preparation for him selling the main event at 1.2.

And there's a reason he has a meaningless sample size for someone wanting to be a professional poker player. He doesn't put in the volume.