Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
I’ve often wondered about Cosmo and am going to Vegas with the wife for a special occasion three days in May. It always seems so more expensive than other premium properties (for me at least - I have m life and Wynn Insider) - would you pay more to stay there over Wynn/Encore, V/P?
I've only stayed at the V once and it was around 7 years ago, I've played at the Wynn but never stayed there, so I can't really comment about the rooms other than that the Cosmo fountain view bedroom is by far better than the V suite I had. The balcony + view is incredible, there's a pic in my TR if you want to see
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...-wife-1731660/.
As far as the casino goes, cosmo is definitely a younger crowd overall, but it doesn't have that Hardrock/PH bachelor party vibe, and it's not so young that older couples would feel out of place. I would say it's just as nice as the Wynn, but with a different style. Wynncore is pure luxury to every detail, Cosmo has its own brand of swanky luxury that I kind of prefer when I'm in party mode, but that comes down to your personal preference. That combined with the location, I just have no desire to stay anywhere else, but if you don't wander much, obviously not a factor.
If you have a good status at one of the other properties I'd hit up a host and see if you can get a comparable discount since you want to try it out. Don't do anything less than a terrace studio + view.
To actually answer your question: If you spend any time in your room at all, I think the balcony + view is worth paying more if W/V don't offer that. If you're up 19 hours a day, then no.