Quote:
Originally Posted by bodybuilder32
I was hard on you in LLSNL because you are a 1/3 player offering GTO theory advice in low stakes, which the games don't apply. You can beat 2/5 playing ABC, so the fact you are stuck at 1/3, where the games play small, tells me you have glaring leaks. I don't need to point out the fancy play syndrome, we can save it for the strategy forum.
Please link one instance of me advocating that we should be playing GTO at 1/3. I am exploitative AF. Although GTO is good to know and can be applied in tough spots vs good TAGs (hardly ever), I almost never play GTO and try to exploit as much as possible.
I agree that you can beat 2/5 playing ABC. Although probably not for more than 5 bb/hr since any good player won't pay off your big hands and in Vegas half the table is good players usually. Beating 2/5 for 10 bb/hr will require some of that "FPS".
The bolded statement shows that you are (most likely unjustifiably) cocky and also presumptuous. I played online poker full time for 18 months and have played probably 2k hours live. Over the last 1250 hours since I've taken live poker more seriously and actually played full time in Vegas, my win rate at 1/2 and 1/3 have been more than OK despite suffering a horrible 250 ish hour break even stretch this WSOP. I've played some 2/5 and 5/5 and have done fine.
But more important than win rates over a somewhat "insignificant sample" is how you match up to your opposition. In the 1100 hours or so of 1/2 and 1/3 since May 2017, there's been maybe 4 or 5 players I've encountered that I felt were comparable or better than me. Everyone else I assume is trash. And they really are. Even the grinders. From simple things like paying off nits when it's a clear fold to bet sizings (wtf is a $15 raise over 2 limpers at 1/3) to not topping off their stack to $300 when they have $200 in front of them, they are just bad and I genuinely think that I am one of the best regs at 1/2 or 1/3 in Las Vegas (not that it takes much to get to this point). I've played some 2/5 last summer and 5/5 in LA. There are many players in those games that are better than me, but there's enough fish for me to beat it for at least 5 bb/hr IMO. I'm playing lower now because school costs way more than it should.
Perhaps you should focus more on improving your game than talking trash on 2+2. Who are you anyways? Where do you play and what's your main game? Have you ever posted a graph?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Registered 2018
Bikeking had the nerd look, and it was genuine. He probably should have flaunted it by dressing the part and by exaggerating his nerdy mannerisms. Maybe, it's not too late for this. There is an empty niche out there for a poker nerd that needs to be occupied. I'm not saying that he should go Pee Wee Herman. What I'm saying is that he should exaggerate what he already is and does.
Bikeking should probably go for a 5 video comeback and see how it goes.
I'm not sure what BK is doing these days, but I don't think poker is going well for him. I haven't followed any recent vlogs but didn't he get to a point where he had 2k left to his name after that bank incident? I'm not saying he needs to stop vlogging, but what he definitely needs to do is make money away from the casino. He can still play and vlog occasionally, but with that thin of a "bankroll" it's time to put poker on the back burner.