Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
Well, I guess it’s a question of who the target market is. Personally, I like the idea of cheaper seats to appeal to families and allow for more children to go to the game. Petco Park in San Diego is a fine example. They have a 42k+ seat stadium with a “downtown” type area for shops and a grassy field where families can set up blankets for picnics and watch the game.
I guess if Vegas is more interested in appealing to the rich and luxury markets, smaller makes more sense. Especially if they make the playoffs and the forced scarcity of seats drives the ticket prices on the secondary market up to the point where only the rich can afford to go.
Ticket prices are only part of the equation. Most teams would gladly sell $22 tickets to people who are going to go and spend $15 for a beer and $10 for a hot dog (maybe multiple times). Spending more on concessions than the ticket is the norm.
Concession sales are of the biggest pieces of contention beteeen sports teams and the cities they are located in. For example, in the city of Chicago, Wrigley Field is owned by the Cubs. They get 100% of the concessions of their games. Soldier Field (home of the Bears) is owned by the city. As a result, the Bears split the profits from concessions with the city.
It makes a huge difference.
Anyone know if the public money going to support the A's in Vegas will be backed by concession money?