Quote:
Originally Posted by entirecircus
For example, I've tracked my play for the last 8 years. I'm an average player at best, who has read a few books, and played casually.
If I filter to Las Vegas casinos only, I have 318 hours tracked (I know, not very much), and I'm a small winner. (2BB-ish)
In case the OP is still reading any of this...
I have every cash session tracked since 2007, and I've never filtered in this way...completely ridiculous on my part. So, I just did.
Filtered on just Vegas, I have 1,855 hours overall. 1,161 is 1/2 or 1/3, and the rest is 2/5 with a tiny sample of 5/10 (like 26 hours). My 1/2 win rate is 9.3bb/hr and my 2/5 is 4.7bb/hr. I've never hung out a lot with casino/live pros who really make solid income at these stakes, so I have no idea where that falls re: 'good' or 'bad' when it comes to being a winning player, but I suspect it's a serviceable performance level. But...enough to live on? I guess if I were 22 and would be happy living in a shitty studio somewhere with no health insurance and a beater car, I guess maybe?
I will say that while I enjoy trying to play my best, Vegas trips are vacations, and as such there was plenty of drinking, fun with friends, various sub-optimal play etc. . If I were playing for a job my win rates would be at least marginally better I'm sure, but still...not very encouraging numbers when you translate them into dollars that need to pay rent etc.
Anyway, over 75% of these hours are between 2007 and 2012, when poker was hugely easier to beat in Vegas. If I filter on just say, 2014-2019 (my last trip was just pre-pandemic) those numbers go down, and I'm way better now than I was then. The low stakes are still beatable for sure, but since 2013 or so (a bit after black Friday obv) it started to become necessary to game select in a real way in 2/5. It also became necessary to study and learn theory.
Before that time, really all it took was a very basic understanding of position, how to calculate direct and implied odds, a small amount of aggression, and discipline. This is still enough for 1/2, but not 2/5 in my experience.
When I was younger (like, 2007-2012) I went to Vegas way more often for way longer trips. The games were ridiculous all the time. It just isn't like that now. If I started now, at my current skill level, and played all 2/5 , I'm not certain that I'd beat 2/5 for a rate that could be reasonably be referred to as 'income.'
What's the point? If your results over a reasonable sample aren't way better than mine, don't do it imo. I mean, nobody wants to live in a van. Over the time I outlined above, I was an ok winner, but there were some bad trips in there. I'm scrolling through the sessions and there was a trip in 2012 where I played 51 hours of 2/5 and lost $5,520. How would your 20k bankroll take that if you were living on your poker income? Not great, right?
I guess if you're young and have no obligations or people who count on you, then what the hell...have an adventure. But if this is meant to be a serious attempt at being a 'pro' maybe not so much.