Quote:
Originally Posted by cf410
Isai Scheinberg and his group built the company to what it is being exremely customer centric. The new owners have different priorities and therefore cannot be expected to adhere to what was. They have to go forward with what is, and that is that they likely overpaid (for the locations they have access to) and have to recoup the costs to satisfy their investors.
I'm not sure why so many players are so shocked at these non-player friendly changes under the new ownership.
RE 'they likely overpaid for the site', I find it pretty hard to imagine that a company of Amaya's size making a $5billion+ purchase wouldn't do full research in order to get the best estimate of the value of the site (including reductions in the playerpool due to having to adhere to gambling regulations and withdraw from certain countries).
I am not shocked that changes are happening, but it doesn't mean that the changes being made are acceptable. Amaya now are obligated to make as much profit as they can for the investors. However as discussed on the show, from an outside perspective it seems like a lot of the changes will hurt the site long-term. Some of the changes are absolutely ridiculous.
For example, in the UK from next year onwards we will have a reduction in VPP multipliers, which means that we will earn less rakeback. This is designed so that players are responsible for a portion of the tax that Amaya are required to pay. I don't agree that stars should expect the players (customers) to pay for 50% of the tax that they are obligated to pay for as a COMPANY, especially when players themselves are not actually required by law to pay their own tax on gambling winnings in the UK. However stars have found a way to reduce their own costs by effectively raking us even more in the UK than elsewhere. Imo if stars want to operate in a highly lucrative, regulated UK market they should be prepared to absorb the tax costs themselves. As I said I don't think raking the players more is right for them to do, but unfortunately they are able to and we have to deal with it.
However in addition the above, stars are now planning to rake every single rebuy in mtts for UK players. This is completely outrageous! Stars used the excuse of new tax laws etc to justify this change, however as mentioned we are already effectively footing 50% of the tax bill and EACH rebuy or addon will effectively pay the tax 10x over! So not just covering their costs, rinsing us for a huge profit. This post in particular is very good at explaining this issue for those that are more interested:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=732
Finally, I am not at all an expert on economics but I am pretty sure that Amaya would be considered to have a monopoly by any measure/definition that is used by regulators in order to stop market abuse etc.