That said I can confirm from personal experiences that Kassouf's speech play is often even worse than depicted; he probably reined it in because he knew he was being watched.
He's had dealer, then floor tell him to stop talking multiway (saying things like "oh you look and then bet? look and then bet?" etc after someone bet in 3way pot, read people's hand ranges multiway etc), 5+ times, and after he finally got asked to leave the casino for the day, he tried to defend himself saying "I just didn't know I didn't know" guy's been playing poker 6+ years of course he knows, he's just trying to bend the rules, and he tries to say "okay I won't anymore" so stupid, he's been warned 5+ times and only after they threaten and kick him out does he say he'll stop?
So what I mean is he possibly is worse than he is shown to be, and also motivation wise, he definitely is not innocent or "never would do anything wrong". He frequently break rules when possible. The issue is that he might not have broken any concrete rules in the coverage.
Of course, not listening to the floor person's ruling is in fact breaking the rules; being disruptive to the players after being warned is breaking the rules. Whether we like the floor person's rulling or not (I do, as someone who's played with him), it IS in the rules for him to listen.
Some explanation as to why I like the ruling:
Lots of people are fans of him, says he's trying to make poker fun again. Please understand watching the antics on TV is very different from playing with him. It gets stale real fast, and the thing is he's not just talking to people who wants to talk, he talks at brick walls, and OMC over 70s who can't hear him properly and slow the game down. He joined our PLO game with a stupid short stack with his "in for the minimum out for the max" spiel, take pictures for his stupid facebook group and instagram, which is all fine, but he ruins the game by making it <12 hands an hour ( sometimes less than 10, that might seem impossible he plays super loose in PLO so he's in every pot and tanking every spot; if he were DECENT and slow, then at least he can only tank so often, 1.5x a hand at most, but he was in every pot and tanked EVERY spot, as you can see in coverage, regardless if he has actual decision).
It's ridiculous but he's got to be some 100+bb/100 loser at the game and yet nobody would want him in.
You want to talk about making poker fun? How about not making it so 70+ year olds get pissed off by being asked questions rudely (even if you argue no raised voice, it's clearly rude to talk to someone when they don't want you to talk to them; on public transit this would be harassment; do we really want to encourage behaviour on poker tables which in other public spaces would be called harassment?), makes people want to quit games. Other old guys who don't care also become less active. They go to sleep because they don't get to play a hand. These guys are old, get tired when bored and nothing keeps their interest (f k maybe I'm old but I felt like falling asleep too waiting for him to be done too). They want to PLAY POKER, they want to SEE FLOPS, but they can't if their plan to peel big raises pre with junk then c/f flops ends with them waiting another 10+ minutes before the hand is over.
People are losing their money and trying to lose the rest of it or get unstuck, and he's making it impossible. If I am some rich tilted whale who's ready to spew off, I'd leave the table and go to roulette or join another table. It's so ****** bad for the game it's insane.
Of course, we don't just ban people because they are "bad for the game", but he's doing in a way that is disruptive, rude, and unpleasant. It has a very real effect, it's not something that happens to cry babies, as I hear people talk. F ck, maybe it is, but only in the sense that most poker players are cry babies. Bro, we're paying 200 pounds an hour, we're paying for the experience we want, one which involves more hands than when playing with will kassouf, and one where people aren't intentionally agitated and asked stupid questions repeatedly.
The thing is there's no winning. If you don't answer, he'll keep asking and asking why you aren't saying anything. If you answer, you'll get him to speak more. There's absolutely no way to stop him, and everyone will get angry at you for presumably not doing the right thing to stop him, and it makes everyone angry.
That's why I kind of understand the woman who got him the round penalty. It seems really stupid she's responding to him at all instead of making her decision without talking to him, but the way he talks he eggs you on and tries to get you to respond, and I can see how many people, especially recreational players, get upset and respond when indeed the best tactic is to ignore him (as most regs do). It's rude, nasty, and preying on people wanting to be fun and not having be grilled. Now you can argue that's like saying check-raising shouldn't be allowed. Sure, but at some point we as a community agree that check raising makes poker more fun. I want people who've had to deal with kassouf tell me genuinely that having a kassouf on every table you play poker at for the rest of your life is a good idea and makes poker more fun.