Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Pokercast 430 - William Kassouf Pokercast 430 - William Kassouf

10-04-2016 , 10:29 PM
Anyone who thinks his "blathering" doesn't bear results, just watch the last hand of episode 8. Lau clearly let Kassouf get under his skin and get stubborn. The guy is great to watch.
10-04-2016 , 11:27 PM
He's not great to watch for more than like five minutes. I can't imagine being at his table for 12 hours. He just repeats the same couple lines over and over. I don't think he would pass a Turing test.
10-05-2016 , 03:41 AM
I think that what TChan and Adam miss—after all of the talk over the past couple of years about how tanking is horrible—is that what Kassouf is doing is a form of tanking. He's slowing the game down for everyone.

He talks when he's facing a decision—which can be seen in later episodes when he just jabbers without having a hand to call with—he talks through his opponents' decisions, and he talks when other people are trying to think even when he's not in the hand.

Yeah, it's the thing he does to use every edge to get every chip, it's the thing he does to use every edge to get every chip, it's the thing he does to use every edge to get every chip, but frankly, so is tanking and staring.

Why not just bring a vuvuzela to the table?
10-05-2016 , 12:18 PM
Seriously, stop defending Kassouf.

116. Etiquette Violations: Repeated etiquette violations will result in the imposition of penalties assessed by the Tournament Staff. Examples include, but are not limited to, unnecessarily touching other participants’ cards or chips, body, or clothing, delay of the game, repeatedly acting out of turn, betting out of reach of the dealer, or excessive chatter. Excessive chatter includes, but is not limited to, talking or conversation that causes a disruption of participants who are in a hand.

Talk all you want when action is on you; don't disrupt another player's right to consider their action when it's their turn. This isn't that hard and the poker community defending this guy is making themselves look really bad. Just stop.
10-05-2016 , 11:55 PM
Guy seems to have sociopathic traits.
I wouldn't mind being seated with him though. He gives a ton of information and I'd be using his talk to my advantage.
I'm not condoning his behaviour as it appears to have upset a lot of people, which is obviously not good, but it's a mountain from a molehill kinda situation from where I'm looking.
10-07-2016 , 09:34 PM
He is terrible for poker and acts like a douche
10-09-2016 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllJackedUp
Seriously, stop defending Kassouf.

116. Etiquette Violations: Repeated etiquette violations will result in the imposition of penalties assessed by the Tournament Staff. Examples include, but are not limited to, unnecessarily touching other participants’ cards or chips, body, or clothing, delay of the game, repeatedly acting out of turn, betting out of reach of the dealer, or excessive chatter. Excessive chatter includes, but is not limited to, talking or conversation that causes a disruption of participants who are in a hand.

Talk all you want when action is on you; don't disrupt another player's right to consider their action when it's their turn. This isn't that hard and the poker community defending this guy is making themselves look really bad. Just stop.
That obviously is directed at players not in a hand since it says you should participants who are in a hand. If he's heads up in a hand, it's fine. #clutching
10-17-2016 , 05:54 PM
Did anyone check if he had the parts of the ESPN episode quoted 100% word for word? He wasn't explaining what happened, he was saying word for word what was broadcast on the episode.

He either has an amazing memory or has already watched the episodes he is in 5+ times each.
10-17-2016 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoyWWFC
That obviously is directed at players not in a hand since it says you should participants who are in a hand. If he's heads up in a hand, it's fine. #clutching
It seems to me as if it was intentionally written ambiguous enough to catch either situation. But, I don't know what the author(s) of that rule had in mind.
10-17-2016 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by that_pope
Did anyone check if he had the parts of the ESPN episode quoted 100% word for word? He wasn't explaining what happened, he was saying word for word what was broadcast on the episode.

He either has an amazing memory or has already watched the episodes he is in 5+ times each.
Or he repeats the same stock phrases thousands upon thousands of times. I'm actually not certain he could pass a Turing test.
10-17-2016 , 07:07 PM
But he wasn't just reciting his parts, he was doing Stacy (and her accent), Jack Effel, Cliff Josephy, etc.
10-21-2016 , 08:17 PM
After this weeks episode we can safely conclude he is the single worst person for poker in years. He is also an awful human being, period. If one of him were at every table Nobody on earth would want to play poker.

Few people are in more dire need of a serious beating.
10-21-2016 , 10:54 PM
that escalated quickly.
10-22-2016 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
After this weeks episode we can safely conclude he is the single worst person for poker in years. He is also an awful human being, period. If one of him were at every table Nobody on earth would want to play poker.

Few people are in more dire need of a serious beating.
Lol, what on earth are you on about? Guy did nothing wrong, was personally attacked by a number of people on the table while they mocked him for being a low stakes player. Pretty sure mocking people for playing £2/£5 cash or $10 tournaments online is pretty bad for poker. How you think Josephy et al come off looking better is beyond me.

Would love to see the guys get Josephy on and find out why it's OK to be an asshat to people or Vayo on to find out why he lied about Kassouf - "He brought a woman to tears earlier, I wouldn't have a problem otherwise." What an idiot.
10-23-2016 , 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoyWWFC
Lol, what on earth are you on about? Guy did nothing wrong, was personally attacked by a number of people on the table while they mocked him for being a low stakes player. Pretty sure mocking people for playing £2/£5 cash or $10 tournaments online is pretty bad for poker. How you think Josephy et al come off looking better is beyond me.

Would love to see the guys get Josephy on and find out why it's OK to be an asshat to people or Vayo on to find out why he lied about Kassouf - "He brought a woman to tears earlier, I wouldn't have a problem otherwise." What an idiot.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. He broke several rules and was tanking every hand. He is awful for poker
10-24-2016 , 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. He broke several rules and was tanking every hand. He is awful for poker
His stalling was bad

His talking was annoying but part of his game, nothing to logically criticize there

The way the rest of the table acted was way worse for poker than Kassouf... elitism, negativity, gang mentality, just absolutely abhorrent

Call the floor, get them to penalize Kassouf with his stalling, and move on. The way the rest of the table reacted to Kassouf was worse than the way Kassouf acted (which was pretty bad)
10-25-2016 , 02:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ, De 'Berg!
Call the floor, get them to penalize Kassouf with his stalling, and move on. The way the rest of the table reacted to Kassouf was worse than the way Kassouf acted (which was pretty bad)

If I am not mistaken they did call the floor for the stalling and he got away with a warning. And after that he tank folded on a 9h board against two all ins holding absolute air (can't remember his exact holding). Plus, after he was busted he asked for a penalty on a guy that was still in it which was also pretty ****ty imo.

Benger's outburst was obviously way out of line, so was the name calling but I am not sure we can judge which behavior was worse unless we played with him for long hours, watched him take a minute (or whatever it was) to look at his cards before every single hand and then listen to him talking non stop while tanking excessively. And the worst part is that even in his exit interview he seems oblivious to how bad his stalling is while on the other hand I think Josephy, Benger and the others have regretted their actions and their comments (that doesn't change the fact that they came off bad as well ofourse).

But I have to give him props because even in the heat of the moment, right before moving all in with his KK he said something like "Ok, do you want to gamble? I 'm all in!" Always the speech play lol
10-25-2016 , 02:51 PM
Reposting here because I've played with Kassouf. Can confirm that he knows what he does is annoying and at times rule breaking, and he's definitely not beyond breaking rules:

Quote:
That said I can confirm from personal experiences that Kassouf's speech play is often even worse than depicted; he probably reined it in because he knew he was being watched.

He's had dealer, then floor tell him to stop talking multiway (saying things like "oh you look and then bet? look and then bet?" etc after someone bet in 3way pot, read people's hand ranges multiway etc), 5+ times, and after he finally got asked to leave the casino for the day, he tried to defend himself saying "I just didn't know I didn't know" guy's been playing poker 6+ years of course he knows, he's just trying to bend the rules, and he tries to say "okay I won't anymore" so stupid, he's been warned 5+ times and only after they threaten and kick him out does he say he'll stop?

So what I mean is he possibly is worse than he is shown to be, and also motivation wise, he definitely is not innocent or "never would do anything wrong". He frequently break rules when possible. The issue is that he might not have broken any concrete rules in the coverage.

Of course, not listening to the floor person's ruling is in fact breaking the rules; being disruptive to the players after being warned is breaking the rules. Whether we like the floor person's rulling or not (I do, as someone who's played with him), it IS in the rules for him to listen.

Some explanation as to why I like the ruling:

Lots of people are fans of him, says he's trying to make poker fun again. Please understand watching the antics on TV is very different from playing with him. It gets stale real fast, and the thing is he's not just talking to people who wants to talk, he talks at brick walls, and OMC over 70s who can't hear him properly and slow the game down. He joined our PLO game with a stupid short stack with his "in for the minimum out for the max" spiel, take pictures for his stupid facebook group and instagram, which is all fine, but he ruins the game by making it <12 hands an hour ( sometimes less than 10, that might seem impossible he plays super loose in PLO so he's in every pot and tanking every spot; if he were DECENT and slow, then at least he can only tank so often, 1.5x a hand at most, but he was in every pot and tanked EVERY spot, as you can see in coverage, regardless if he has actual decision).

It's ridiculous but he's got to be some 100+bb/100 loser at the game and yet nobody would want him in.

You want to talk about making poker fun? How about not making it so 70+ year olds get pissed off by being asked questions rudely (even if you argue no raised voice, it's clearly rude to talk to someone when they don't want you to talk to them; on public transit this would be harassment; do we really want to encourage behaviour on poker tables which in other public spaces would be called harassment?), makes people want to quit games. Other old guys who don't care also become less active. They go to sleep because they don't get to play a hand. These guys are old, get tired when bored and nothing keeps their interest (f k maybe I'm old but I felt like falling asleep too waiting for him to be done too). They want to PLAY POKER, they want to SEE FLOPS, but they can't if their plan to peel big raises pre with junk then c/f flops ends with them waiting another 10+ minutes before the hand is over.

People are losing their money and trying to lose the rest of it or get unstuck, and he's making it impossible. If I am some rich tilted whale who's ready to spew off, I'd leave the table and go to roulette or join another table. It's so ****** bad for the game it's insane.

Of course, we don't just ban people because they are "bad for the game", but he's doing in a way that is disruptive, rude, and unpleasant. It has a very real effect, it's not something that happens to cry babies, as I hear people talk. F ck, maybe it is, but only in the sense that most poker players are cry babies. Bro, we're paying 200 pounds an hour, we're paying for the experience we want, one which involves more hands than when playing with will kassouf, and one where people aren't intentionally agitated and asked stupid questions repeatedly.

The thing is there's no winning. If you don't answer, he'll keep asking and asking why you aren't saying anything. If you answer, you'll get him to speak more. There's absolutely no way to stop him, and everyone will get angry at you for presumably not doing the right thing to stop him, and it makes everyone angry.

That's why I kind of understand the woman who got him the round penalty. It seems really stupid she's responding to him at all instead of making her decision without talking to him, but the way he talks he eggs you on and tries to get you to respond, and I can see how many people, especially recreational players, get upset and respond when indeed the best tactic is to ignore him (as most regs do). It's rude, nasty, and preying on people wanting to be fun and not having be grilled. Now you can argue that's like saying check-raising shouldn't be allowed. Sure, but at some point we as a community agree that check raising makes poker more fun. I want people who've had to deal with kassouf tell me genuinely that having a kassouf on every table you play poker at for the rest of your life is a good idea and makes poker more fun.
lol @ kassouf not being bad for the game, or that he didn't break rules. He contradicted floor multiple times about talking and stalling and disruptive behavior, how is that not breaking rules? You realize there's a rule that you have to listen to floor rulings right?
10-26-2016 , 07:16 AM
I think players at the table need to think about their own emotional stability.!
10-28-2016 , 10:41 AM
Great William Kassouf interview on the Thinking Poker Podcast. They are much tougher on him and don't let things slide. It's really revealing
10-28-2016 , 11:37 AM
I'm only about two years behind on Thinking Poker Podcast. So maybe I'll get to listen to it before 2019.
10-30-2016 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xander biscuits
Great William Kassouf interview on the Thinking Poker Podcast. They are much tougher on him and don't let things slide. It's really revealing
Thanks for this tip, listening now. Is the sound quality always this bad? Probably why I never subbed for it.
10-30-2016 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilbury Twist
Thanks for this tip, listening now. Is the sound quality always this bad? Probably why I never subbed for it.
Well, they don't always have the crazy British guy talking over everything, if that's what you mean
10-30-2016 , 07:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokiri
Well, they don't always have the crazy British guy talking over everything, if that's what you mean
No, the sound quality in general is pretty bad. The main host's voice is coming in extremely hot and overmodulating. I'm guessing he's talking through a gamer's headset via Skype. Or perhaps he's just too close to the mic. Fairly common thing in podcasts, as it has created opportunities for hosts with no experience in radio or professional audio.

That said...

GREAT interview. They did not hold back at all, never withholding from picking apart a few holes in his story. I also found them very fair, since most viewers seem to have taken an either-or, love-him-or-hate-him stance on Will Kassouf.

The funny part (which comes up in every interview) is that Kassouf says stuff like, "I'm not being abrasive, I mean no disrespect, but if you don't like it, then don't enter the tournament. Go home, sit in your underwear, and click buttons online." Yet giving someone an ultimatum is pretty much being abrasive and disrespectful.
11-01-2016 , 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xander biscuits
Great William Kassouf interview on the Thinking Poker Podcast. They are much tougher on him and don't let things slide. It's really revealing
Only about 15 minutes into the interview and I've already shifted from thinking he is moderately entertaining to thinking he is a legit douchebag. I have not watched any WSOP coverage, so maybe I'm late to the party on that assessment. The thing that rubbed me the wrong way is that he claims he takes so long to make a decision because he is not playing ABC and is thinking on another level. He sounds like that other guy who said his preflop decision tree is enormous. But based on the report from the Pokercast, he was tanking before he even looked at his cards sometimes. I'm crossing my fingers that they call him out on that later in the interview.

      
m